And sometimes it's enough to simulate on the level of api's to get same results
Sorry but I can't provide more objective reasons why not use Cypress except that cypress is more about aggressive marketing and promotion, but not a useful tool for testing. I don't want to write node.js inside separate…
jQuery promises are good as well, but I'm writing from 2020 :)
this 2 'killer features' could be implemented in your tests in a day or two. Also, you can use video recording features implemented in docker images like Zalenium
Cypress is very bad. What frustrated me most of all is that you can't use node.js, only 'browser javascript'. Also, absence of promises makes Cypress way behind its alternatives. Don't be fool, use TypeScript + Cucumber…
And sometimes it's enough to simulate on the level of api's to get same results
Sorry but I can't provide more objective reasons why not use Cypress except that cypress is more about aggressive marketing and promotion, but not a useful tool for testing. I don't want to write node.js inside separate…
jQuery promises are good as well, but I'm writing from 2020 :)
this 2 'killer features' could be implemented in your tests in a day or two. Also, you can use video recording features implemented in docker images like Zalenium
Cypress is very bad. What frustrated me most of all is that you can't use node.js, only 'browser javascript'. Also, absence of promises makes Cypress way behind its alternatives. Don't be fool, use TypeScript + Cucumber…