An alternative is - from the commencement of the project - to have a watermark or other visual design element present which makes the site unusable to the client but still allows them to evaluate the work.
The data should have been labelled from the end of each month rather than from the beginning - then there wouldn't be the anomaly on the 31st. I.e. n[i] should be sum over all days d of tickets[d] where d is the i-th…
Does "ms" mean milliseconds or microseconds? And are these times for one iteration of the code fragment? 2 milliseconds to compare two strings seems awfully slow.
I think the point was that you racked up frequent flier miles for using your credit card.
Why are they sending out this letter before the final?
An alternative is - from the commencement of the project - to have a watermark or other visual design element present which makes the site unusable to the client but still allows them to evaluate the work.
The data should have been labelled from the end of each month rather than from the beginning - then there wouldn't be the anomaly on the 31st. I.e. n[i] should be sum over all days d of tickets[d] where d is the i-th…
Does "ms" mean milliseconds or microseconds? And are these times for one iteration of the code fragment? 2 milliseconds to compare two strings seems awfully slow.
I think the point was that you racked up frequent flier miles for using your credit card.
Why are they sending out this letter before the final?