Listen to yourself. I'll write in my style, you write in yours. In what world is it anything less than obnoxious to say that? Time to hit the logout button for me permanently I say. https://imgur.com/a/L8hoqhp
You're making straw man examples, but if you want to understand more, I suggest any paper on Bitcoin. Personally, I'm not a fan of it. But the thesis is real, and it might have delivered on its promise if the world…
I take it you've never known anyone who has tried to run even a small consumer AI company. Do you think that they all independently come up with the same censorship rules, despite no law mandating them? Why do you think…
The author just died, and is now dead, and unable to provide an opinion, like many others who have fallen under hard times. Those with privilege therefore tend to have their opinions over-represented in the public…
I’d settle for a different someone at this point. What were you expecting me to say?
I think it’s safe to say that many of us feel a lot less safe directly because of these policies and the inferred intentions of the company behind them. Nobody is arguing for unsafe models. We just don’t want to live in…
Fun fact: If you show fable this post, it will route you to 4.8 automatically.
It's still a vote, and votes don't require reasons, and shouldn't be dismissed out of hand. There's a growing chorus of those who are fed up with rules for thee but not for me.
I think Grok on x.com is a reasonable case study. There’s the stuff we heard about and then there’s a separate category of things that weren’t newsworthy, and only the newsworthy things prompted changes to be made.
Anonymous is the hero we need here for sure
Elon is brilliant when it comes to hardware. But unfortunately with xAI, he went on a firing spree, PayPal Mafia style, just like with Twitter when he bought it, shortly before doing another hiring drive, and failing to…
My lived experience doesn’t care what the downvotes say (many here are privileged, after all), and it is only a matter of time imo unless something is done about the industry to change course.
No, yes, I know, and it doesn’t affect my point. Thanks for your concern, HN!
Not sure if you saw this, but it says at the footer: > 1.Methodology: The study was carried out in collaboration with IPSOS among 19,000 adults aged 18 to 75 across 18 countries, between 12 January and 16 February 2026.…
The specific text reads like a favor to Elon Musk's xAI, since "Truth-seeking" is the buzzword Elon Musk frequently used to talk about Grok: Sec. 3 Unbiased AI Principles. It is the policy of the United States to…
That stopped being super frustrating for me about a year ago. Wishing it were the other way though…
Well, the background checks in the US at least have to follow laws. Then theres reference checks, less formal but generally still follow some kind of rigor or process and you generally know who they’re going to talk to.…
That depends on what the definition of “is” is. But kidding aside, only now that we are talking about tech CEOs are people suddenly disliking the AI psychosis term in large numbers. Seems like privilege to me. I’d be…
Seems like privilege to soften the term only now that we are talking about CEOs.
You’re right, we should kick them while they are down instead, starving them of all “companionship” (otherwise, how could we uphold our current values as a society)? We need to keep producing a regular supply of…
This is a terrible way to soften an obvious alignment failure with AI rollout.
Easily fixable with another KPI to measure the gaming itself :P
Sounds like yet another story about the Goliaths of the AI world ruining the Davids. They even “respected” him by posting his details to the world, in a possibly illegal way.
Do you?
Twitter files
Listen to yourself. I'll write in my style, you write in yours. In what world is it anything less than obnoxious to say that? Time to hit the logout button for me permanently I say. https://imgur.com/a/L8hoqhp
You're making straw man examples, but if you want to understand more, I suggest any paper on Bitcoin. Personally, I'm not a fan of it. But the thesis is real, and it might have delivered on its promise if the world…
I take it you've never known anyone who has tried to run even a small consumer AI company. Do you think that they all independently come up with the same censorship rules, despite no law mandating them? Why do you think…
The author just died, and is now dead, and unable to provide an opinion, like many others who have fallen under hard times. Those with privilege therefore tend to have their opinions over-represented in the public…
I’d settle for a different someone at this point. What were you expecting me to say?
I think it’s safe to say that many of us feel a lot less safe directly because of these policies and the inferred intentions of the company behind them. Nobody is arguing for unsafe models. We just don’t want to live in…
Fun fact: If you show fable this post, it will route you to 4.8 automatically.
It's still a vote, and votes don't require reasons, and shouldn't be dismissed out of hand. There's a growing chorus of those who are fed up with rules for thee but not for me.
I think Grok on x.com is a reasonable case study. There’s the stuff we heard about and then there’s a separate category of things that weren’t newsworthy, and only the newsworthy things prompted changes to be made.
Anonymous is the hero we need here for sure
Elon is brilliant when it comes to hardware. But unfortunately with xAI, he went on a firing spree, PayPal Mafia style, just like with Twitter when he bought it, shortly before doing another hiring drive, and failing to…
My lived experience doesn’t care what the downvotes say (many here are privileged, after all), and it is only a matter of time imo unless something is done about the industry to change course.
No, yes, I know, and it doesn’t affect my point. Thanks for your concern, HN!
Not sure if you saw this, but it says at the footer: > 1.Methodology: The study was carried out in collaboration with IPSOS among 19,000 adults aged 18 to 75 across 18 countries, between 12 January and 16 February 2026.…
The specific text reads like a favor to Elon Musk's xAI, since "Truth-seeking" is the buzzword Elon Musk frequently used to talk about Grok: Sec. 3 Unbiased AI Principles. It is the policy of the United States to…
That stopped being super frustrating for me about a year ago. Wishing it were the other way though…
Well, the background checks in the US at least have to follow laws. Then theres reference checks, less formal but generally still follow some kind of rigor or process and you generally know who they’re going to talk to.…
That depends on what the definition of “is” is. But kidding aside, only now that we are talking about tech CEOs are people suddenly disliking the AI psychosis term in large numbers. Seems like privilege to me. I’d be…
Seems like privilege to soften the term only now that we are talking about CEOs.
You’re right, we should kick them while they are down instead, starving them of all “companionship” (otherwise, how could we uphold our current values as a society)? We need to keep producing a regular supply of…
This is a terrible way to soften an obvious alignment failure with AI rollout.
Easily fixable with another KPI to measure the gaming itself :P
Sounds like yet another story about the Goliaths of the AI world ruining the Davids. They even “respected” him by posting his details to the world, in a possibly illegal way.
Do you?
Twitter files