Given how oppressed by whites they supposedly are, you'd think they would be chomping at the bit to get away from us. Yet "white flight" continues to be a thing, while "black flight" strangely does not...
They're calling for expulsion, not genocide. And if that "send them back to Africa" rhetoric is the most extreme you can find, then it's comparatively much more humane than the opposition:…
Exactly. That standard is only applicable to white identitarians.
> Isn't that irrelevant? It attests to the reality of race, something leftist free speech haters deny.
> 2. Widening the definition of "incitement" to relax the imminent and direct requirements. I don't see why "kill all blacks" should be protected while "kill this black with this gun" shouldn't be. If they have their…
This latest leftist push (or putsch) against freedom of speech is telling. If they really were confident that they could prevail in open debate against their opponents on the relevant issues--such as whether diversity…
Given how oppressed by whites they supposedly are, you'd think they would be chomping at the bit to get away from us. Yet "white flight" continues to be a thing, while "black flight" strangely does not...
They're calling for expulsion, not genocide. And if that "send them back to Africa" rhetoric is the most extreme you can find, then it's comparatively much more humane than the opposition:…
Exactly. That standard is only applicable to white identitarians.
> Isn't that irrelevant? It attests to the reality of race, something leftist free speech haters deny.
> 2. Widening the definition of "incitement" to relax the imminent and direct requirements. I don't see why "kill all blacks" should be protected while "kill this black with this gun" shouldn't be. If they have their…
This latest leftist push (or putsch) against freedom of speech is telling. If they really were confident that they could prevail in open debate against their opponents on the relevant issues--such as whether diversity…