If there's a 2 degree (or a 2 kilos) increase in my body over my entire life (which is similar to these 100 years) I wouldn't care.
Nutrition is a pseudo-science.
At a 0-100 Celsius scale, or whatever is the equivalent in Fahrenheit, there will be an almost impossible to see increase over the time span of 100 years. I'm not saying nothing is happening, but those charts are…
And they are trying to convince me using charts with a truncated y axis? How about doing it with charts that are not misleading?
If there's a 2 degree (or a 2 kilos) increase in my body over my entire life (which is similar to these 100 years) I wouldn't care.
Nutrition is a pseudo-science.
At a 0-100 Celsius scale, or whatever is the equivalent in Fahrenheit, there will be an almost impossible to see increase over the time span of 100 years. I'm not saying nothing is happening, but those charts are…
And they are trying to convince me using charts with a truncated y axis? How about doing it with charts that are not misleading?