> Remember Cambridge Analytica? The affair proved that it’s possible to manipulate people on a mass scale by the content they consume No, it didn't. That is based on the assumption people voted for Trump who would have…
You are trying to argue semantics about a person bleeding, walking down the street. People walking down the street bleeding need help not a decision to make.
This is where I get confused. I've seen online that about 3% of all CO2 emissions are attributed to humans. Is that wrong?
> Remember Cambridge Analytica? The affair proved that it’s possible to manipulate people on a mass scale by the content they consume No, it didn't. That is based on the assumption people voted for Trump who would have…
You are trying to argue semantics about a person bleeding, walking down the street. People walking down the street bleeding need help not a decision to make.
This is where I get confused. I've seen online that about 3% of all CO2 emissions are attributed to humans. Is that wrong?