LLMs are to a large degree trained on pirated books.
Even the premise is ridiculous, inlay hints for parameter names have existed for a really long time. What human using a code editor could come up with this "problem"? The comments all seem to be nodding along and even…
I wonder whether a person prompted this slop and is somehow unaware of the existence of LSPs, or if it's entirely automated and the planning subagent hallucinated this being an issue for humans.
> Software is everywhere and thus the value of maintaining software and the value of software engineering remains high. This is an unfinished argument. What if we get coding agents to maintain software? What if frequent…
> What I think is much more likely to happen is the number of software engineers greatly reduces, but the remaining ones actually get paid more. You realize that this is contradictory, right? If the number of…
You can't get paid doing them. If coding goes away, decades of experience become worthless instantly. Not all of it, but the vast majority, enough to justify starting over in another career. In that world, it will have…
As far as I know, you can't disable the python interpreter. It's part of the reasoning mode. If you ask ChatGPT, it will confirm that it uses the python interpreter to do arithmetic on large numbers. To you, that should…
I chose Mistral because it's a large SOTA model that allows me to disable tool calling. If you try using ChatGPT, you'll see it goes into reasoning mode (It flashes the text "Working") and takes a while when asked to do…
Ask a local AI or a chatbot that allows you to disable tool calling to multiply two large number for example. This is what Mistral outputs: The result of multiplying 63,157,997,633 by 63,114,90,009 is:…
It's a well known fact that LLMs struggle with basic arithmetic of large numbers, that's not what they are made for. Most chatbots will just call a python interpreter in the background.
This policy has existed for (non-3D) printers and image editing programs for decades now. They will refuse to print currency or anything with a specific watermark.
Their business is making money. If they can build money printing machines, they're not going to refuse to use them because that's "not their business". Do you really think they would be out donating trillions of dollars…
Messages to clients are presumably handled by the agency, not the performer.
I wouldn't consider him an AI-researcher.
Swahili is subcontinental lingua franca spoken by 200M people and growing quickly. Polish is spoken by a shrinking population in one country where English is understood anyways.
So it's a large version of those rechargeable hand-warmers?
Integrated circuits don't "start with C". What does that even mean? C is just an interchangeable language the compiler frontend parses. A microprocessor starts by executing the machine code at the reset vector. This…
I'm not sure what this has to do with positivism. Data is evidence for all models that predict the data. It doesn't matter that almost all of those models are extremely wrong, while the most accurate models are gross…
IC?
Information about an author can be evidence in support of or against the credibility of their claims.
You're mistaken. It says something about the shape of humans. Bicycles, which are powered by the human body, show the inferiority of bipedalism to wheels, when it comes to fast and efficient locomotion.
Falsifying the logical inverse of X is identical to verifying X. There's nothing about negation that does anything here. You're making the same mistake people make when claiming "You can't prove a negative". > The key…
Then people will simply falsify the logical inverse of their current hypotheses. Preregistration is a more promising approach.
The human form is terrible for most productive things. We are slow, weak, short, and inaccurate. Robotic arms are the true multitalents of manipulating the physical world.
Because the US is the only country that defected from the Paris agreement. The US is the only country led by climate change deniers. Tons of countries are led by malevolent and selfish leaders, but none are as…
LLMs are to a large degree trained on pirated books.
Even the premise is ridiculous, inlay hints for parameter names have existed for a really long time. What human using a code editor could come up with this "problem"? The comments all seem to be nodding along and even…
I wonder whether a person prompted this slop and is somehow unaware of the existence of LSPs, or if it's entirely automated and the planning subagent hallucinated this being an issue for humans.
> Software is everywhere and thus the value of maintaining software and the value of software engineering remains high. This is an unfinished argument. What if we get coding agents to maintain software? What if frequent…
> What I think is much more likely to happen is the number of software engineers greatly reduces, but the remaining ones actually get paid more. You realize that this is contradictory, right? If the number of…
You can't get paid doing them. If coding goes away, decades of experience become worthless instantly. Not all of it, but the vast majority, enough to justify starting over in another career. In that world, it will have…
As far as I know, you can't disable the python interpreter. It's part of the reasoning mode. If you ask ChatGPT, it will confirm that it uses the python interpreter to do arithmetic on large numbers. To you, that should…
I chose Mistral because it's a large SOTA model that allows me to disable tool calling. If you try using ChatGPT, you'll see it goes into reasoning mode (It flashes the text "Working") and takes a while when asked to do…
Ask a local AI or a chatbot that allows you to disable tool calling to multiply two large number for example. This is what Mistral outputs: The result of multiplying 63,157,997,633 by 63,114,90,009 is:…
It's a well known fact that LLMs struggle with basic arithmetic of large numbers, that's not what they are made for. Most chatbots will just call a python interpreter in the background.
This policy has existed for (non-3D) printers and image editing programs for decades now. They will refuse to print currency or anything with a specific watermark.
Their business is making money. If they can build money printing machines, they're not going to refuse to use them because that's "not their business". Do you really think they would be out donating trillions of dollars…
Messages to clients are presumably handled by the agency, not the performer.
I wouldn't consider him an AI-researcher.
Swahili is subcontinental lingua franca spoken by 200M people and growing quickly. Polish is spoken by a shrinking population in one country where English is understood anyways.
So it's a large version of those rechargeable hand-warmers?
Integrated circuits don't "start with C". What does that even mean? C is just an interchangeable language the compiler frontend parses. A microprocessor starts by executing the machine code at the reset vector. This…
I'm not sure what this has to do with positivism. Data is evidence for all models that predict the data. It doesn't matter that almost all of those models are extremely wrong, while the most accurate models are gross…
IC?
Information about an author can be evidence in support of or against the credibility of their claims.
You're mistaken. It says something about the shape of humans. Bicycles, which are powered by the human body, show the inferiority of bipedalism to wheels, when it comes to fast and efficient locomotion.
Falsifying the logical inverse of X is identical to verifying X. There's nothing about negation that does anything here. You're making the same mistake people make when claiming "You can't prove a negative". > The key…
Then people will simply falsify the logical inverse of their current hypotheses. Preregistration is a more promising approach.
The human form is terrible for most productive things. We are slow, weak, short, and inaccurate. Robotic arms are the true multitalents of manipulating the physical world.
Because the US is the only country that defected from the Paris agreement. The US is the only country led by climate change deniers. Tons of countries are led by malevolent and selfish leaders, but none are as…