ironic that this comment needs an appendix
I'm in Chile. It totally blows here too.
"The analysis seems to be indicating that the answer is "more"," That wasn't my read at all. What made you think that?
I looked him up also. He spoke at Google IO a few years ago. I can't tell if he worked at Google, but he also wrote some posts on their Geo Dev blog. So he could biased toward Google too. Anyway, I read the post twice…
ironic that this comment needs an appendix
I'm in Chile. It totally blows here too.
"The analysis seems to be indicating that the answer is "more"," That wasn't my read at all. What made you think that?
I looked him up also. He spoke at Google IO a few years ago. I can't tell if he worked at Google, but he also wrote some posts on their Geo Dev blog. So he could biased toward Google too. Anyway, I read the post twice…