> They're going to want some sort of analysis And I want $1 billion dollars. Doesn’t mean someone’s going to give it to me.
> The practice — supported by artificial intelligence and known as dynamic pricing or surveillance pricing — can lead to two consumers paying different amounts for the same item from the same retailer, at roughly the…
> Scientists who might have come to the US three years ago have little reason to do so now. Been saying that about EU and China for decades now. Yet the top European and Chinese still come to the US. Even in April 2026.
mic drop
> Let's see how long it takes before the big US AI companies start lobbying to outright ban use of Chinese AI, even the open source / local models. For "national security" reasons, of course. Already do on EVs.
> The US supports the genocide in Gaza, it supports the bombing of Lebanon. The US itself has now started (another) war and bombed Iran. > With Trump they are now openly hostile to European democracies, and ICE and…
> People have been convinced of that my entire life, and I'm old now. People in the UK still think they are the #1 superpower today
> It has more to do with gold is now worth almost 3x what it was 2 years ago. And why is it worth 3x? But S&P500 is not?
lol you conveniently left out 50% of the ticket fees
> Better this than slinging Tomahawks at school children. I’d rather the one be slinging tomahawks, than the one receiving tomahawks because my country decided to reduce military spending.
> One does not “simply” reduce spending. Why does stock price go up after mass layoffs?
> what profits are you talking about to offset the losses? You don’t need profit to offset the losses. You can simply reduce spending / expenses.
> When it becomes a bigger problem, other indices with higher quality controls will out compete the current ones and be used by asset managers seeking safety Doubt it. The world does not allow perfect competition.
> Hi Nick, your software is a horrendous encroachment on users' privacy and its quality is subpar to those of us who know what we're working with. We don't use your product here. It’s ok, OpenAI is cooked. Feel bad for…
> They're going to want some sort of analysis And I want $1 billion dollars. Doesn’t mean someone’s going to give it to me.
> The practice — supported by artificial intelligence and known as dynamic pricing or surveillance pricing — can lead to two consumers paying different amounts for the same item from the same retailer, at roughly the…
> Scientists who might have come to the US three years ago have little reason to do so now. Been saying that about EU and China for decades now. Yet the top European and Chinese still come to the US. Even in April 2026.
mic drop
> Let's see how long it takes before the big US AI companies start lobbying to outright ban use of Chinese AI, even the open source / local models. For "national security" reasons, of course. Already do on EVs.
> The US supports the genocide in Gaza, it supports the bombing of Lebanon. The US itself has now started (another) war and bombed Iran. > With Trump they are now openly hostile to European democracies, and ICE and…
> People have been convinced of that my entire life, and I'm old now. People in the UK still think they are the #1 superpower today
> It has more to do with gold is now worth almost 3x what it was 2 years ago. And why is it worth 3x? But S&P500 is not?
lol you conveniently left out 50% of the ticket fees
> Better this than slinging Tomahawks at school children. I’d rather the one be slinging tomahawks, than the one receiving tomahawks because my country decided to reduce military spending.
> One does not “simply” reduce spending. Why does stock price go up after mass layoffs?
> what profits are you talking about to offset the losses? You don’t need profit to offset the losses. You can simply reduce spending / expenses.
> When it becomes a bigger problem, other indices with higher quality controls will out compete the current ones and be used by asset managers seeking safety Doubt it. The world does not allow perfect competition.
> Hi Nick, your software is a horrendous encroachment on users' privacy and its quality is subpar to those of us who know what we're working with. We don't use your product here. It’s ok, OpenAI is cooked. Feel bad for…