>Do not give me LLM output unless you also give me the full prompt text. Umm the point is you won't know to ask this question in the first place, and even if you did, you wouldn't have any leverage to demand this…
IIRC the courts ruled that because it would be implausibe for a person to use google books previews to read an entire work (you'd have to make a whole bunch of separate accounts to do so), it could not plausibly impact…
Did anyone expect it to go the other way? Europe is more hardcore about copyright than the US, and that's saying something. Germany is practically...well I was going to say they're nazis about it but perhaps that's in…
Lmao. No. Content that is wholesale generated by AI is also not subject to copyright in the US. It relies on the honor system and you can always modify the material juuuust enough that you can claim the copyright. In…
The same is true in the US. This is a nothing burger.
Sounds like an elaborate rationale to be lazy.
Well, youre trading quality for accessibility. For some, that's acceptable. To me, the number of steam games that emulate that aesthetic is so massive that its become oversaturated in my view. And in fairness, there was…
Nintendo is notoriously litigious.
I consider all homebrew stuff very cool but the number of games emulating PS1 / N64 aesthetics is so massively oversaturated at this point that I'm kind of burned out on it. But in general, the thing that really…
Really? It just seems aggressively stupid.
It is circular. The conclusion of your argument is included in the premises. Textbook begging the question, which is circular reasoning. "Slop" existed before AI. Just because LLMs were involved in the writing of a text…
That's not what I said. Do you have trouble reading? Are you subliterate or just lazy?
Please explain where I went wrong. Please explain why the onus is on the person presenting this story to account for all of the bad uses of AI, such that we should simply dismiss the story outright. This is pure idiocy.
This took a few minutes for me to read. If that's what you consider high effort, that's a bigger problem. Ofc, reading comprehension is fairly poor these days but that was a trend before AI. Maybe you're just…
Yes, it is. Working on a sega genesis homebrew game. I focus on visuals, dialogue, narrative logic, music, etc., and GPT worries about the rest. It works for me. I couldn't care less if works for others. I'm working on…
You have done nothing to demonstrate how that's even relevant here. The person who posted this is not "bad" simply because they have used an LLM.
>The part that I personally find difficult is that I can’t easily gauge the amount of human effort put in. The amount of effort is not relevant. If I spend all day trying the jump my car battery in 100 degree weather,…
Then just state the conflict of interest instead of resorting to insults. The problem with your way of thinking is, sometimes your opponent is detestable, but that doesn't make them wrong. Kneejerk dismissal of an…
That's circular reasoning
And the signal I'm sending is, when I see people do that, I find it to be lazy and totally irrelevant to the content.
Then why are you trying to debate me?
It says it was written by deepseek v4. You are making it sound like they're being deceptive. Life is too short yet you waste it complaining about things like this. I dont think you're wise. Youre provincial.
Fwiw I am much more impressed with the sophistication of someone's argument than i am their writing style. Kant has contributed much more than parfit depsite the abstract nature of his writing and it's not even close.
[flagged]
>Do not give me LLM output unless you also give me the full prompt text. Umm the point is you won't know to ask this question in the first place, and even if you did, you wouldn't have any leverage to demand this…
IIRC the courts ruled that because it would be implausibe for a person to use google books previews to read an entire work (you'd have to make a whole bunch of separate accounts to do so), it could not plausibly impact…
Did anyone expect it to go the other way? Europe is more hardcore about copyright than the US, and that's saying something. Germany is practically...well I was going to say they're nazis about it but perhaps that's in…
Lmao. No. Content that is wholesale generated by AI is also not subject to copyright in the US. It relies on the honor system and you can always modify the material juuuust enough that you can claim the copyright. In…
The same is true in the US. This is a nothing burger.
Sounds like an elaborate rationale to be lazy.
Well, youre trading quality for accessibility. For some, that's acceptable. To me, the number of steam games that emulate that aesthetic is so massive that its become oversaturated in my view. And in fairness, there was…
Nintendo is notoriously litigious.
I consider all homebrew stuff very cool but the number of games emulating PS1 / N64 aesthetics is so massively oversaturated at this point that I'm kind of burned out on it. But in general, the thing that really…
Really? It just seems aggressively stupid.
It is circular. The conclusion of your argument is included in the premises. Textbook begging the question, which is circular reasoning. "Slop" existed before AI. Just because LLMs were involved in the writing of a text…
That's not what I said. Do you have trouble reading? Are you subliterate or just lazy?
Please explain where I went wrong. Please explain why the onus is on the person presenting this story to account for all of the bad uses of AI, such that we should simply dismiss the story outright. This is pure idiocy.
This took a few minutes for me to read. If that's what you consider high effort, that's a bigger problem. Ofc, reading comprehension is fairly poor these days but that was a trend before AI. Maybe you're just…
Yes, it is. Working on a sega genesis homebrew game. I focus on visuals, dialogue, narrative logic, music, etc., and GPT worries about the rest. It works for me. I couldn't care less if works for others. I'm working on…
You have done nothing to demonstrate how that's even relevant here. The person who posted this is not "bad" simply because they have used an LLM.
>The part that I personally find difficult is that I can’t easily gauge the amount of human effort put in. The amount of effort is not relevant. If I spend all day trying the jump my car battery in 100 degree weather,…
Then just state the conflict of interest instead of resorting to insults. The problem with your way of thinking is, sometimes your opponent is detestable, but that doesn't make them wrong. Kneejerk dismissal of an…
That's circular reasoning
And the signal I'm sending is, when I see people do that, I find it to be lazy and totally irrelevant to the content.
Then why are you trying to debate me?
It says it was written by deepseek v4. You are making it sound like they're being deceptive. Life is too short yet you waste it complaining about things like this. I dont think you're wise. Youre provincial.
Fwiw I am much more impressed with the sophistication of someone's argument than i am their writing style. Kant has contributed much more than parfit depsite the abstract nature of his writing and it's not even close.
[flagged]
[flagged]