> Paper that was needed to be archived was archived. That's good to hear. So where might we find the archived versions of that materials in that donation?
What does "checked for archiving" mean? Is this collection available to the public in any way?
Well, that's better than all them being pulped. But not that much better, if it's all been split up and sent to private collections. I am pretty sure, knowing Jason Scott, that his intent was that this collection should…
I agree. I have the same policy when setting up servers: don't have a "primary" and a "backup" server, make both servers production servers and have the code that uses them alternate between them, pick a random one,…
This seems to come around on a regular basis, so there's got to be something to it. To summarize my thoughts on it: 1) yes, there are tons of things that could be improved in it, 2) even with such improvements, it's a…
> Paper that was needed to be archived was archived. That's good to hear. So where might we find the archived versions of that materials in that donation?
What does "checked for archiving" mean? Is this collection available to the public in any way?
Well, that's better than all them being pulped. But not that much better, if it's all been split up and sent to private collections. I am pretty sure, knowing Jason Scott, that his intent was that this collection should…
I agree. I have the same policy when setting up servers: don't have a "primary" and a "backup" server, make both servers production servers and have the code that uses them alternate between them, pick a random one,…
This seems to come around on a regular basis, so there's got to be something to it. To summarize my thoughts on it: 1) yes, there are tons of things that could be improved in it, 2) even with such improvements, it's a…