That’s not the case — all certs are cross-signed with a newer root. The real problem is that certificate issuers have been giving people the old CA chain instead of the new one.
Certificates issued with this CA will have been cross-signed by the newer root certificate, but our CA (Sectigo) was sending the old chain in issuing emails as late as April this year, despite the cross-signed root…
Well yes, of course you can do that. But at that point, why would you reference third-party font URLs, instead of self-hosting them? (The article pretty much begins by stating that this is the fastest option.) If…
It doesn't seem to be caused by that, I've seen the error with and without the /birthday suffix. It looks to be related to missing data from one of the GraphQL responses.
That’s not the case — all certs are cross-signed with a newer root. The real problem is that certificate issuers have been giving people the old CA chain instead of the new one.
Certificates issued with this CA will have been cross-signed by the newer root certificate, but our CA (Sectigo) was sending the old chain in issuing emails as late as April this year, despite the cross-signed root…
Well yes, of course you can do that. But at that point, why would you reference third-party font URLs, instead of self-hosting them? (The article pretty much begins by stating that this is the fastest option.) If…
It doesn't seem to be caused by that, I've seen the error with and without the /birthday suffix. It looks to be related to missing data from one of the GraphQL responses.