My understanding is that mongodb is not durable (http://ivoras.sharanet.org/blog/tree/2010-02-20.mongodb-and-...) - I am not sure I understand how VoltDB is durable, though (but then I know nothing about db…
You do loose useful information, because you don't know where branches started/ended. For feature branches, that's very useful: useful for bisect, useful for reverting a branch. For syncing to upstream, that's indeed…
I think git is much better than hg, but I think most complaints made in the post are fair. Git UI is truly awful. IMO, The two killer features of git are the index and content-based tracking. First the index makes…
Which is exactly what the build service gives you...
The .rpm vs .deb debate is a fallacy. The real issue is that when packaging for say debian and RHEL you have to care about different glibc, different compiler versions with potentially different ABI, different…
My understanding is that mongodb is not durable (http://ivoras.sharanet.org/blog/tree/2010-02-20.mongodb-and-...) - I am not sure I understand how VoltDB is durable, though (but then I know nothing about db…
You do loose useful information, because you don't know where branches started/ended. For feature branches, that's very useful: useful for bisect, useful for reverting a branch. For syncing to upstream, that's indeed…
I think git is much better than hg, but I think most complaints made in the post are fair. Git UI is truly awful. IMO, The two killer features of git are the index and content-based tracking. First the index makes…
Which is exactly what the build service gives you...
The .rpm vs .deb debate is a fallacy. The real issue is that when packaging for say debian and RHEL you have to care about different glibc, different compiler versions with potentially different ABI, different…