what im seeing from this chart is that we should be using the nop instruction for everything
With LLVM I doubt this will remain true. LLVM makes custom code generation far too easy for GCC to remain viable imo.
Makes me feel like I'm writing JavaScript, if that makes any sense. Also I hate fun.
How will it output on my VT100 serial terminal? :P Somewhat related fun fact, anyone can submit an emoji to the Unicode Consortium annually, submissions are actually open right now:…
Why would anyone bother with GCC then? :P
Is it still the case that the Linux kernel cannot be compiled using clang, or can you do that now?
Big fan of all of this except for the emojis in my console
what im seeing from this chart is that we should be using the nop instruction for everything
With LLVM I doubt this will remain true. LLVM makes custom code generation far too easy for GCC to remain viable imo.
Makes me feel like I'm writing JavaScript, if that makes any sense. Also I hate fun.
How will it output on my VT100 serial terminal? :P Somewhat related fun fact, anyone can submit an emoji to the Unicode Consortium annually, submissions are actually open right now:…
Why would anyone bother with GCC then? :P
Is it still the case that the Linux kernel cannot be compiled using clang, or can you do that now?
Big fan of all of this except for the emojis in my console