It's great to see a story about people not getting sexually assaulted at Ubisoft.
Apparently Bezos is worried that someone out there might not know he's a dickhead yet.
This will go nowhere and everyone involved will be working for Apple and Google in a few years' time.
I thought I'd seen bad analogies before, but I had no idea what was possible.
I read the description of a "self-authoring" mind. Can someone ELI5 how it differs from the description of a "psychopath"?
I wonder who's spouse, in-law or sibling will get most of that £222m.
I feel like I wasn't supposed to see that.
This is written in the style of someone who spends 20 straight hours at a time edit-warring on a wiki.
It means, "offensive or repugnant to NFSN," which is a reasonable definition for them to be using imho.
>At Google there were interviews exactly like what Manara prepared us for: data structures & algorithms problem-solving. I'm surprised this hasn't become the main point of discussion here yet. Edit: I mean Google's…
Someone should paste Zuckerberg's face in the middle of the logo whenever they see one of those.
It's probably that vibranium deposit. I saw a film about it.
Facial recognition software to count board members? Would that be applauded?
>Certainly I think ... covids and some other groups, show that intelligence is rather easy to come by Oh shit I hope not!
I don't think you would need exact duplication for these situations to arise.
Youtube is the problem. Anyone can put whatever shit they want online, which is fine in itself, but put your snake oil on Youtube and Google's Skynet will expertly find rubes to sell for you and show it to them. But on…
Maybe! The real problem is to help people avoid people they want to avoid, not banning clients on technical grounds. A genuine attempt at solving the problem wouldn't be based on universal bans. There could be groups…
Is cancelling your nose really a price worth paying?
It doesn't even matter whether someone is cheating. All that matters is whether they're ruining the game. You don't need a rootkit to determine that.
You forgot to use cowsay.
"a world where a certain subset of people with the technical knowledge have computing freedom" Even that is optimistic.
We're making good progress toward a world without sharks. We can do it!
"In some cases, this means you may get advertising in the mail" It's nice to know Google is concerned about this dystopian possibility.
People like to talk about technology saving us, but there is only one technology that can stop climate change now. I can't remember what it's called though. It's kind of a big wooden frame with a big metal thing that…
I think you proved the parent's point.
It's great to see a story about people not getting sexually assaulted at Ubisoft.
Apparently Bezos is worried that someone out there might not know he's a dickhead yet.
This will go nowhere and everyone involved will be working for Apple and Google in a few years' time.
I thought I'd seen bad analogies before, but I had no idea what was possible.
I read the description of a "self-authoring" mind. Can someone ELI5 how it differs from the description of a "psychopath"?
I wonder who's spouse, in-law or sibling will get most of that £222m.
I feel like I wasn't supposed to see that.
This is written in the style of someone who spends 20 straight hours at a time edit-warring on a wiki.
It means, "offensive or repugnant to NFSN," which is a reasonable definition for them to be using imho.
>At Google there were interviews exactly like what Manara prepared us for: data structures & algorithms problem-solving. I'm surprised this hasn't become the main point of discussion here yet. Edit: I mean Google's…
Someone should paste Zuckerberg's face in the middle of the logo whenever they see one of those.
It's probably that vibranium deposit. I saw a film about it.
Facial recognition software to count board members? Would that be applauded?
>Certainly I think ... covids and some other groups, show that intelligence is rather easy to come by Oh shit I hope not!
I don't think you would need exact duplication for these situations to arise.
Youtube is the problem. Anyone can put whatever shit they want online, which is fine in itself, but put your snake oil on Youtube and Google's Skynet will expertly find rubes to sell for you and show it to them. But on…
Maybe! The real problem is to help people avoid people they want to avoid, not banning clients on technical grounds. A genuine attempt at solving the problem wouldn't be based on universal bans. There could be groups…
Is cancelling your nose really a price worth paying?
It doesn't even matter whether someone is cheating. All that matters is whether they're ruining the game. You don't need a rootkit to determine that.
You forgot to use cowsay.
"a world where a certain subset of people with the technical knowledge have computing freedom" Even that is optimistic.
We're making good progress toward a world without sharks. We can do it!
"In some cases, this means you may get advertising in the mail" It's nice to know Google is concerned about this dystopian possibility.
People like to talk about technology saving us, but there is only one technology that can stop climate change now. I can't remember what it's called though. It's kind of a big wooden frame with a big metal thing that…
I think you proved the parent's point.