No, it is open for as long as these certificates are trusted.
This was a decision I made in my old job, seems to be proved correct.
I untrusted all of their certificates after their (disgraceful) press release (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50195110).
Go does not. For Java, I would not look at their x509 handling for inspiration.
[dead]
This is already the case for Go.
Programming languages are useful?
Oh yeah I remember this guy. Amazing work.
> the idiot DIA officer Do you have a link? Think I missed this one.
This happened to me a couple of times (out of thousands of meetings) and it was because the audio was for some reason being piped to a different audio device.
In my anecdote, the tattooed person was Asian but non-Japanese. We did this several times, but of course it's still a small sample size, so take this with a pinch of salt.
Usually a bandage will suffice to cover it. Even for very tattooed people, can be quite liberal with it.
* Not everyone is doing it. * Yes, I do. * It's not, that is from a stray Copilot commit. * My main issue is not related to the non-disclosure.
The medium article was enthralling, thanks for sharing it.
The readme and commit messages were written by an LLM without disclosure. I didn't look at the code.
Code that works is such a low bar. This is not the only property that we require from software engineering.
How did they configure this, do you know?
Oh, sorry, misinterpreted you! Although I am not sure I agree with your dismissal of nay-sayers. We can equally dismiss the opinions of early proponents. Perhaps maybe we should be hedging on all early opinions…
That was dismal. The LK-99 discourse was much more fun.
> congratulations on lack of ability to read with understanding This seems weirdly aggressive and not nice.
> There is also a marked increase in dense, AI-written papers. AI tools are making it easy for authors to flood arXiv and other repositories with these low-value papers. arXiv should ban these submitters.
Yeah, I also don't believe it.
The hashing algorithm's security properties are a security property of Git. This is because: * we pin to commit hashes and expect this to refer to immutable content, * commit and tag signatures are over the hash. The…
Having a fetch break is better than having a fetch pull down malware.
Wireguard is secure against a quantum computer though, via an additional pre-shared key. > If an additional layer of symmetric-key crypto is required (for, say, post-quantum resistance), WireGuard also supports an…
No, it is open for as long as these certificates are trusted.
This was a decision I made in my old job, seems to be proved correct.
I untrusted all of their certificates after their (disgraceful) press release (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50195110).
Go does not. For Java, I would not look at their x509 handling for inspiration.
[dead]
This is already the case for Go.
Programming languages are useful?
Oh yeah I remember this guy. Amazing work.
> the idiot DIA officer Do you have a link? Think I missed this one.
This happened to me a couple of times (out of thousands of meetings) and it was because the audio was for some reason being piped to a different audio device.
In my anecdote, the tattooed person was Asian but non-Japanese. We did this several times, but of course it's still a small sample size, so take this with a pinch of salt.
Usually a bandage will suffice to cover it. Even for very tattooed people, can be quite liberal with it.
* Not everyone is doing it. * Yes, I do. * It's not, that is from a stray Copilot commit. * My main issue is not related to the non-disclosure.
The medium article was enthralling, thanks for sharing it.
The readme and commit messages were written by an LLM without disclosure. I didn't look at the code.
Code that works is such a low bar. This is not the only property that we require from software engineering.
How did they configure this, do you know?
Oh, sorry, misinterpreted you! Although I am not sure I agree with your dismissal of nay-sayers. We can equally dismiss the opinions of early proponents. Perhaps maybe we should be hedging on all early opinions…
That was dismal. The LK-99 discourse was much more fun.
> congratulations on lack of ability to read with understanding This seems weirdly aggressive and not nice.
> There is also a marked increase in dense, AI-written papers. AI tools are making it easy for authors to flood arXiv and other repositories with these low-value papers. arXiv should ban these submitters.
Yeah, I also don't believe it.
The hashing algorithm's security properties are a security property of Git. This is because: * we pin to commit hashes and expect this to refer to immutable content, * commit and tag signatures are over the hash. The…
Having a fetch break is better than having a fetch pull down malware.
Wireguard is secure against a quantum computer though, via an additional pre-shared key. > If an additional layer of symmetric-key crypto is required (for, say, post-quantum resistance), WireGuard also supports an…