I don't disagree with anything you said, which makes me think I worded my response incorrectly. I was using the author's term "true privacy", but what I meant is traditional privacy that, when not explicitly attempting…
If you need extension, you wouldn't use this pattern. If you need to avoid this technique entirely because you're so frequently needing to unit test private methods, you have a design problem, not a testing problem.…
I don't disagree with anything you said, which makes me think I worded my response incorrectly. I was using the author's term "true privacy", but what I meant is traditional privacy that, when not explicitly attempting…
If you need extension, you wouldn't use this pattern. If you need to avoid this technique entirely because you're so frequently needing to unit test private methods, you have a design problem, not a testing problem.…