Hi Alex, I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't put words in my mouth. I never once suggested racial profiling as acceptable, and I wasn't insinuating it either. I know you were just using it as an adjacent example, but I…
I've lived in California my whole life, and I'm just basing it off my experiences over the years. California enacted a law in 2014 that turned all theft under $950 into a misdemeanor instead of a felony (reverted last…
I'm not AI, but thanks for the rudeness.
These high crime areas are predominantly in blue counties/states, and liberal judges are typically soft on crime.
I hate how all the text is AI generated slop. It makes me think they don't actually care about what they're doing, or that they didn't do it at all.
What an honor. I got a high score of seven.
Bringing guns to shoot people you disagree with, then shooting them and injuring them for doing their job is not a harmless demonstration. It's terrorism, and they deserve what they got.
Whoever funded the laboratories in Wuhan.
Feels like a bit of a dramatization.
What do you mean hijacked? I'm not familiar with that theory.
No because it's a childish oversimplification. It's legitimately the kind of argument a middle schooler would make. It frames your position as the only morally reasonable one, implying that anyone who believes anything…
No offense, but you're being so dramatic for no reason. You're not that important, and it doesn't matter what you believe. Your comment just reeks of smugness and immaturity.
Not sure how you're getting this. 90% of these comments are as left leaning as they come.
How completely dishonest to call this a demonstration. They brought guns and shot government officials. Trying to kill people you disagree with isn't demonstrating, it's terrorism. So insane for people to defend this.
[flagged]
Just tried typing Jordan on mine, and my suggestions were "on", "is", and the Jordanian flag. So I'm pretty sure you had to have typed the words "Jordan Peterson" before for it to make that association. The donation…
The early iterations of swipe were very inaccurate, yes. But the newest swipe release mentioned here is much more mature. It's not perfect, but it's practically on par with GBoard aside from a few blips here and there.…
Yeah, it's pretty pathetic on Google and Apple's part. It might be not a foolproof solution, but I think the license is better than nothing. Then you have a legal precedent that you can cite when you file a lawsuit…
Yeah, honestly. I love open source as much as the next guy, but I don't understand why people are so up in arms about this. The license feels pretty reasonable. The source code is fully available, none of the features…
Yeah, I just disagree with the terminology of calling something "banned", which makes it seem a lot more dire than it is. Local book curation at a school-district level doesn't seem newsworthy to me, which is what the…
I think calling them "banned" is so disingenuous. There are actual banned books that are illegal to own in the United States. None of these "banned books" come anywhere close to meeting that criteria. Very cool project…
I'm unfamiliar with this, can you elaborate?
Hi Alex, I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't put words in my mouth. I never once suggested racial profiling as acceptable, and I wasn't insinuating it either. I know you were just using it as an adjacent example, but I…
I've lived in California my whole life, and I'm just basing it off my experiences over the years. California enacted a law in 2014 that turned all theft under $950 into a misdemeanor instead of a felony (reverted last…
I'm not AI, but thanks for the rudeness.
These high crime areas are predominantly in blue counties/states, and liberal judges are typically soft on crime.
I hate how all the text is AI generated slop. It makes me think they don't actually care about what they're doing, or that they didn't do it at all.
What an honor. I got a high score of seven.
Bringing guns to shoot people you disagree with, then shooting them and injuring them for doing their job is not a harmless demonstration. It's terrorism, and they deserve what they got.
Whoever funded the laboratories in Wuhan.
Feels like a bit of a dramatization.
What do you mean hijacked? I'm not familiar with that theory.
No because it's a childish oversimplification. It's legitimately the kind of argument a middle schooler would make. It frames your position as the only morally reasonable one, implying that anyone who believes anything…
No offense, but you're being so dramatic for no reason. You're not that important, and it doesn't matter what you believe. Your comment just reeks of smugness and immaturity.
Not sure how you're getting this. 90% of these comments are as left leaning as they come.
How completely dishonest to call this a demonstration. They brought guns and shot government officials. Trying to kill people you disagree with isn't demonstrating, it's terrorism. So insane for people to defend this.
[flagged]
[flagged]
Just tried typing Jordan on mine, and my suggestions were "on", "is", and the Jordanian flag. So I'm pretty sure you had to have typed the words "Jordan Peterson" before for it to make that association. The donation…
The early iterations of swipe were very inaccurate, yes. But the newest swipe release mentioned here is much more mature. It's not perfect, but it's practically on par with GBoard aside from a few blips here and there.…
Yeah, it's pretty pathetic on Google and Apple's part. It might be not a foolproof solution, but I think the license is better than nothing. Then you have a legal precedent that you can cite when you file a lawsuit…
Yeah, honestly. I love open source as much as the next guy, but I don't understand why people are so up in arms about this. The license feels pretty reasonable. The source code is fully available, none of the features…
[flagged]
Yeah, I just disagree with the terminology of calling something "banned", which makes it seem a lot more dire than it is. Local book curation at a school-district level doesn't seem newsworthy to me, which is what the…
I think calling them "banned" is so disingenuous. There are actual banned books that are illegal to own in the United States. None of these "banned books" come anywhere close to meeting that criteria. Very cool project…
[flagged]
I'm unfamiliar with this, can you elaborate?