This is a rarity. Many interviewers are so biased and lack nuance that they literally just go with whether or not the person passed the question.
[dead]
No way. The people at the forefront of AI, most of them will have a much harder time learning quantum physics. Yes ML is hard but it's nowhere near QE, theoretical math or physics. The reason is simply because ML is…
And You're fucking rude. What the hell is up with that Wild u turn there into hostility. You need to fucking tone your shit down. This is causal conversation not a scientifically rigorous paper making bold claims. That…
Just thought I reference this: 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would…
I don't think he undertands people are more and more hating CA, both inside and outside of the state.
Same reason why Tesla moved and why tons of people are moving out of CA. There's a huge benefit. Also don't think that this workforce is exclusive to CA. AI is easy to learn, it's not quantum physics.
Of course it's nicer to give everyone a humane job. It's not about what's nicer. It's about reality. There's simply not enough jobs to go around if there are no bullshit jobs. Your statement here doesn't make sense to…
If you want to create a world where there's no bullshit jobs at all then you'd be creating a world where millions are unemployed. We are rapidly heading in this direction with automation. AI is beginning to fulfill the…
Does anyone know what I have to learn to "know" about this theory? Is it control theory and classical mechanics?
Is there a way to model this theoretically? Or is it always trial and error? I mean I realize you have to test the thing for "bugs" just wondering if a theory to perfectly model it is even possible.
I disagree. The colloquial understanding for logic is technical. OP is using the term incorrectly and in a strange way. I understand that most of us can still 'understand' his point but that does not mean he's using the…
I'm kidding a bit here. My post is actually agreeing with the parent poster but in a sort of roundabout deceptive way of appearing to disagree. It got flagged and several downvotes. Likely from saying that css is…
>FWIW, I'm amused because I recognize your behavior as that of someone quite young. I acted similar ways 20 years ago and now I think it's just kind of funny to see in other people. If you are actually amused then…
Right. So that's my point. Css is logical. The point made by the article has no point. A claim that css is terrible, has a point.
Logical is orthogonal to terrible. Literally by definition anything designed in a computer must follow logic.
[flagged]
>Your other reply was deleted - I wonder what horrible things it said? Looks like you aren't leaving even though you said you would. I wrote that I wasn't going to read your shit. I changed my mind. So I deleted it.…
You called me adorable, you laugh in my face and make dismissive comments. These words are stated by you to start a fucking war. Any reasonable person can see this. And your counterpoint isn't even charitable. Just a…
>So what? I said you were perpetuating a myth and you were. It still not 'your' thread, what kind of childish nonsense is that? Please do not say things like that here. It is "my" thread. I opened the topic for…
But you're talking shit about me under my thread which my comment is the parent to my face. You're starting shit. I've literally told you I don't appreciate your attitude and you're still starting shit. I have done…
Please don't respond to my thread nor impolitely reference me or accuse me of things if you're going to post things that aren't for me. I already stated this conversation is over. Walk away now. Do not respond me.
Thank you for posting sources, you should have done this in the beginning. Unfortunately I don't like your attitude nor do I care about this topic enough to follow through. No offense. As a result I will not be…
Well no you're the one spreading the myth. Stop. Thanks. Also being quite rude and dismissive as well. No thanks.
Or your statement is a myth and you're one of the sources.
This is a rarity. Many interviewers are so biased and lack nuance that they literally just go with whether or not the person passed the question.
[dead]
No way. The people at the forefront of AI, most of them will have a much harder time learning quantum physics. Yes ML is hard but it's nowhere near QE, theoretical math or physics. The reason is simply because ML is…
And You're fucking rude. What the hell is up with that Wild u turn there into hostility. You need to fucking tone your shit down. This is causal conversation not a scientifically rigorous paper making bold claims. That…
Just thought I reference this: 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would…
I don't think he undertands people are more and more hating CA, both inside and outside of the state.
Same reason why Tesla moved and why tons of people are moving out of CA. There's a huge benefit. Also don't think that this workforce is exclusive to CA. AI is easy to learn, it's not quantum physics.
Of course it's nicer to give everyone a humane job. It's not about what's nicer. It's about reality. There's simply not enough jobs to go around if there are no bullshit jobs. Your statement here doesn't make sense to…
If you want to create a world where there's no bullshit jobs at all then you'd be creating a world where millions are unemployed. We are rapidly heading in this direction with automation. AI is beginning to fulfill the…
Does anyone know what I have to learn to "know" about this theory? Is it control theory and classical mechanics?
Is there a way to model this theoretically? Or is it always trial and error? I mean I realize you have to test the thing for "bugs" just wondering if a theory to perfectly model it is even possible.
I disagree. The colloquial understanding for logic is technical. OP is using the term incorrectly and in a strange way. I understand that most of us can still 'understand' his point but that does not mean he's using the…
I'm kidding a bit here. My post is actually agreeing with the parent poster but in a sort of roundabout deceptive way of appearing to disagree. It got flagged and several downvotes. Likely from saying that css is…
>FWIW, I'm amused because I recognize your behavior as that of someone quite young. I acted similar ways 20 years ago and now I think it's just kind of funny to see in other people. If you are actually amused then…
Right. So that's my point. Css is logical. The point made by the article has no point. A claim that css is terrible, has a point.
Logical is orthogonal to terrible. Literally by definition anything designed in a computer must follow logic.
[flagged]
>Your other reply was deleted - I wonder what horrible things it said? Looks like you aren't leaving even though you said you would. I wrote that I wasn't going to read your shit. I changed my mind. So I deleted it.…
You called me adorable, you laugh in my face and make dismissive comments. These words are stated by you to start a fucking war. Any reasonable person can see this. And your counterpoint isn't even charitable. Just a…
>So what? I said you were perpetuating a myth and you were. It still not 'your' thread, what kind of childish nonsense is that? Please do not say things like that here. It is "my" thread. I opened the topic for…
But you're talking shit about me under my thread which my comment is the parent to my face. You're starting shit. I've literally told you I don't appreciate your attitude and you're still starting shit. I have done…
Please don't respond to my thread nor impolitely reference me or accuse me of things if you're going to post things that aren't for me. I already stated this conversation is over. Walk away now. Do not respond me.
Thank you for posting sources, you should have done this in the beginning. Unfortunately I don't like your attitude nor do I care about this topic enough to follow through. No offense. As a result I will not be…
Well no you're the one spreading the myth. Stop. Thanks. Also being quite rude and dismissive as well. No thanks.
Or your statement is a myth and you're one of the sources.