Arguments should survive on their own merits though, not an appeal to authority. Sometimes a whole field can be flawed (or be afraid of having their funding cut since it comes from only a few sources), and an outsider…
It would be more like an amateur cryptographer finding a flaw with a published algorithm or certain companies security practices. Which can and does happen.
Arguments should survive on their own merits though, not an appeal to authority. Sometimes a whole field can be flawed (or be afraid of having their funding cut since it comes from only a few sources), and an outsider…
It would be more like an amateur cryptographer finding a flaw with a published algorithm or certain companies security practices. Which can and does happen.