@maxerickson I can't reply to you so I'll reply next to you. That looks very interesting. I will have to look into it. Thanks
Have you only seen one benchmark or did you choose such a biased source for trolling? How I know this graph has nothing to do with machine learning? It has JavaScript listed and JavaScript is on the faster end of the…
You can't parallelize a for-loop the way you can apply a function on every member of a vector. If code can be vectorized in Julia, that is what I'm interested in seeing. These samples are obviously not intended for…
Coming from R, I have to ask... Why am I seeing 'for' and 'while' loops? Why isn't this code vectorized? It looks like both implementations suck.
@maxerickson I can't reply to you so I'll reply next to you. That looks very interesting. I will have to look into it. Thanks
Have you only seen one benchmark or did you choose such a biased source for trolling? How I know this graph has nothing to do with machine learning? It has JavaScript listed and JavaScript is on the faster end of the…
You can't parallelize a for-loop the way you can apply a function on every member of a vector. If code can be vectorized in Julia, that is what I'm interested in seeing. These samples are obviously not intended for…
Coming from R, I have to ask... Why am I seeing 'for' and 'while' loops? Why isn't this code vectorized? It looks like both implementations suck.