Comments increase compile time!
> “The best we can hope for is we’re three times faster,” van der Hoeven said. And they talk about billions of digits elsewhere in the article. I doubt that only applies for the ~8.46e184 digits you seem to be talking…
They're not unitless, they're dimensionless, see https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/803955/why-radian-i.... I think the author made a mistake.
Comments increase compile time!
> “The best we can hope for is we’re three times faster,” van der Hoeven said. And they talk about billions of digits elsewhere in the article. I doubt that only applies for the ~8.46e184 digits you seem to be talking…
They're not unitless, they're dimensionless, see https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/803955/why-radian-i.... I think the author made a mistake.