Whose “consensus” ? Google or ad techs. That is not acceptable. The right way is GDPR pop up listing the companies you will share user data. With. If the user approves I am sure no court can touch you.
This is called plausible deniability- the site owner knows what he is doing, but does not care. He could have downloaded the font or used a analytic service which does not collect IP address. Great ruling.
I second that. No difference between gmail & fastmail - mail scanning, automated address collection and no at rest encryption. Tutanota is the best of the lot with encryption at rest, ability to send both plain and…
Whose “consensus” ? Google or ad techs. That is not acceptable. The right way is GDPR pop up listing the companies you will share user data. With. If the user approves I am sure no court can touch you.
This is called plausible deniability- the site owner knows what he is doing, but does not care. He could have downloaded the font or used a analytic service which does not collect IP address. Great ruling.
I second that. No difference between gmail & fastmail - mail scanning, automated address collection and no at rest encryption. Tutanota is the best of the lot with encryption at rest, ability to send both plain and…