Prosperity is causally prior to taxation, not the other way around. To quote the great Bryan Caplan, "It takes a colossal host to sustain colossal parasitism."
Your argument against minority rule is to invoke... the courts? "Majority rule is great. Except when it does stuff I don't like, in which case I'll lean on minority rule by an infinitesimal number of unaccountable dudes…
You seem to be positing a world where “bad” decisions are somehow kept off the ballot, leaving only a menu of “good” options for the wise majority to enact. Well, that’s not our world. When a CA gay marriage ban comes…
No, not literally a smoking hole (though I believe arson was a problem for a time?) But as close to one as you’re going to get in the USA. I can’t disagree more with your majoritarian arguments. You (and I) would…
> doesn’t suggest any useful policy All good points. Some blue cities do very well and some do very poorly. I have to conclude that the problems are mostly exogenous to policy. > being “blue” leads to failure To be…
It's easy to change my mind on this: just provide me a decision rule that'll put rural decay data points on the "failure" side of the classification boundary while leaving urban decay on the other.
I earlier acknowledged the difficulty of coming up with a reasonable definition of "failed." I will say that I don't think it's enough to be simply below-average in literacy or above-average in crime or whatever; you…
Not sure why you were downvoted. This is the best answer I've ever received to my question.
I was vague with the meaning of "liberal." Otherwise I completely stand by the post. * Re: abortion. You reversed the "all circumstances" and "some circumstances" labels: only 29% say the former, 50% say the latter.…
I put the word in quotes to indicate the tendentiousness of any potential definition. I personally don't think of any part of America as having "failed," but if you force me to pick, I'd choose any area that suffered…
Reproductive rights, as understood by liberals, do not have super-majority support [1]. Immigration reform, as understood by liberals, does not have super-majority support [2]. Gun control, as understood by liberals,…
These have been the rules for nearly 250 years. Why are you only up in arms about it now?
Curiously enough, the only parts of the country that have ever approached anything resembling "failure" are (heavily progressive) urban areas like NYC and Detroit.
This thread is for breathless catastrophizing. Not sure why your reasonable comment is here.
Can you explain how the current president "seized" power? Was there some extra-legal mechanism at work that I'm not aware of?
Can you explain in what way this is a "Jim Crow era practice?"
Capitalism only "kills" people in a counterfactual sense. For example, you might posit that, had society gone out of its way to provide medical care to a sick individual, that person still would be alive. But that…
Leftism was the cause of the worst crimes of the 20th century (whose death tolls wildly exceed even that of WWII). The real tail risk resides in views that are considered perfectly respectable.
If we take climate change activists at their word, the answer is a resounding YES. There is a full-blown crisis brewing, one that can only be resolved with massive social changes ("if everyone does a little, we’ll…
Your linked paper does not discuss natural disasters at all. How is this an answer to the parent comment’s concerns?
You're confusing concepts. Regression to the mean doesn't depend on any IID assumption. Conditional expectations are right in the definition! In the bivariate normal case (height, intelligence, etc), it's a necessary…
> It's rational for the company to try to pull them Aren't there issues with follow-on offerings? By taking the entire IPO pot for itself, the company will probably struggle to find investors if/when it needs to come…
The only real practitioner in this thread has one of the only downvoted comments. Incredible.
I’m not mad at anyone, you simply haven’t explained anything. You just keep repeating the standard litany of Republican sins. I never disputed Republicans’ attempt to give themselves an electoral advantage. I just…
Suppose they had in fact won the largest House majority in history. What exactly would it change? How would NN be faring right now? Moral grandstanding aside, I don't see the relevance of any of this.
Prosperity is causally prior to taxation, not the other way around. To quote the great Bryan Caplan, "It takes a colossal host to sustain colossal parasitism."
Your argument against minority rule is to invoke... the courts? "Majority rule is great. Except when it does stuff I don't like, in which case I'll lean on minority rule by an infinitesimal number of unaccountable dudes…
You seem to be positing a world where “bad” decisions are somehow kept off the ballot, leaving only a menu of “good” options for the wise majority to enact. Well, that’s not our world. When a CA gay marriage ban comes…
No, not literally a smoking hole (though I believe arson was a problem for a time?) But as close to one as you’re going to get in the USA. I can’t disagree more with your majoritarian arguments. You (and I) would…
> doesn’t suggest any useful policy All good points. Some blue cities do very well and some do very poorly. I have to conclude that the problems are mostly exogenous to policy. > being “blue” leads to failure To be…
It's easy to change my mind on this: just provide me a decision rule that'll put rural decay data points on the "failure" side of the classification boundary while leaving urban decay on the other.
I earlier acknowledged the difficulty of coming up with a reasonable definition of "failed." I will say that I don't think it's enough to be simply below-average in literacy or above-average in crime or whatever; you…
Not sure why you were downvoted. This is the best answer I've ever received to my question.
I was vague with the meaning of "liberal." Otherwise I completely stand by the post. * Re: abortion. You reversed the "all circumstances" and "some circumstances" labels: only 29% say the former, 50% say the latter.…
I put the word in quotes to indicate the tendentiousness of any potential definition. I personally don't think of any part of America as having "failed," but if you force me to pick, I'd choose any area that suffered…
Reproductive rights, as understood by liberals, do not have super-majority support [1]. Immigration reform, as understood by liberals, does not have super-majority support [2]. Gun control, as understood by liberals,…
These have been the rules for nearly 250 years. Why are you only up in arms about it now?
Curiously enough, the only parts of the country that have ever approached anything resembling "failure" are (heavily progressive) urban areas like NYC and Detroit.
This thread is for breathless catastrophizing. Not sure why your reasonable comment is here.
Can you explain how the current president "seized" power? Was there some extra-legal mechanism at work that I'm not aware of?
Can you explain in what way this is a "Jim Crow era practice?"
Capitalism only "kills" people in a counterfactual sense. For example, you might posit that, had society gone out of its way to provide medical care to a sick individual, that person still would be alive. But that…
Leftism was the cause of the worst crimes of the 20th century (whose death tolls wildly exceed even that of WWII). The real tail risk resides in views that are considered perfectly respectable.
If we take climate change activists at their word, the answer is a resounding YES. There is a full-blown crisis brewing, one that can only be resolved with massive social changes ("if everyone does a little, we’ll…
Your linked paper does not discuss natural disasters at all. How is this an answer to the parent comment’s concerns?
You're confusing concepts. Regression to the mean doesn't depend on any IID assumption. Conditional expectations are right in the definition! In the bivariate normal case (height, intelligence, etc), it's a necessary…
> It's rational for the company to try to pull them Aren't there issues with follow-on offerings? By taking the entire IPO pot for itself, the company will probably struggle to find investors if/when it needs to come…
The only real practitioner in this thread has one of the only downvoted comments. Incredible.
I’m not mad at anyone, you simply haven’t explained anything. You just keep repeating the standard litany of Republican sins. I never disputed Republicans’ attempt to give themselves an electoral advantage. I just…
Suppose they had in fact won the largest House majority in history. What exactly would it change? How would NN be faring right now? Moral grandstanding aside, I don't see the relevance of any of this.