This reminds me of a conversation I had with a friend some years ago. My friend comes from a family of home builders. None of them do it professionally anymore, but they all spent every summer growing up helping dad do…
I disagree. R&D in any industry needs to encourage risk taking. The key is to contain the risks within R&D and never allow them to leak into production. R&D that is not willing to break things will stagnate.
I read up a little on Guix, but I can't reconcile what I read with what you wrote. Guix clearly does track and even bundle dependencies. The part I'm missing is how different packages can rely on different dependencies…
How does Guix relate to Flatpak?
This reminds me of a conversation I had with a friend some years ago. My friend comes from a family of home builders. None of them do it professionally anymore, but they all spent every summer growing up helping dad do…
I disagree. R&D in any industry needs to encourage risk taking. The key is to contain the risks within R&D and never allow them to leak into production. R&D that is not willing to break things will stagnate.
I read up a little on Guix, but I can't reconcile what I read with what you wrote. Guix clearly does track and even bundle dependencies. The part I'm missing is how different packages can rely on different dependencies…
How does Guix relate to Flatpak?