Not yet :)
1. Sure, but just since finite input can be handled quickly doesn't mean it's not turing complete. A million cell tape for the Rule 110 automaton in any language will probably execute in milliseconds, if at all…
I completely agree that it's not a good thing. I know that the browser maintainers also see the increasing complexity of CSS as a bad thing. That's why I was so sceptical to it from the start ...
Barring IE, that requires the old syntax and or had bugs, support for the standard flexbox is now in every modern browser: http://caniuse.com/#feat=flexbox Maybe it's time to stop blaming the standard and start blaming…
Not yet :)
1. Sure, but just since finite input can be handled quickly doesn't mean it's not turing complete. A million cell tape for the Rule 110 automaton in any language will probably execute in milliseconds, if at all…
I completely agree that it's not a good thing. I know that the browser maintainers also see the increasing complexity of CSS as a bad thing. That's why I was so sceptical to it from the start ...
Barring IE, that requires the old syntax and or had bugs, support for the standard flexbox is now in every modern browser: http://caniuse.com/#feat=flexbox Maybe it's time to stop blaming the standard and start blaming…