And by your logic, also what Canonical did. Wee! Why are you still commenting with legal speculation? You realise your name is attached to it, and you are potentially liable for misleading people?
Exactly, you don't own enough of the code to change the license nor do you have the power to just magically change the license texts to allow them to become compatible. We can't allow this one violation without allowing…
Suse does use Btrfs for /home..
yes, lets all base our understandings on shaky legal speculation.
You're not one of the original copyright holders.. Oracle is one of the largest copyright holders. Maybe you should stop posting legal opinions when you clearly have your own bias?
And by your logic, also what Canonical did. Wee! Why are you still commenting with legal speculation? You realise your name is attached to it, and you are potentially liable for misleading people?
Exactly, you don't own enough of the code to change the license nor do you have the power to just magically change the license texts to allow them to become compatible. We can't allow this one violation without allowing…
Suse does use Btrfs for /home..
yes, lets all base our understandings on shaky legal speculation.
You're not one of the original copyright holders.. Oracle is one of the largest copyright holders. Maybe you should stop posting legal opinions when you clearly have your own bias?