From what I understand [1] the existence of exotic spheres in n>5 implies => the Smale conjecture is false in n>5 but does the Smale conjecture being false in n=4 implies nothing => about the existence of exotic spheres…
"Beautifully, all unfoldings of the 4-cube, 4-simplex, and 4-orthoplex are nets." why? is it a theorem or is it obvious?
Is not the main point of the article but the article cite another researcher saying that “Some archaea don’t even divide into two cells; they divide into three. There are many, many mysteries in archaea,” I googled it…
I would like to read more on this, do you have any further references?
Could you elaborate about how does the impossible trinity follows from (a) and (b)?
From what I understand [1] the existence of exotic spheres in n>5 implies => the Smale conjecture is false in n>5 but does the Smale conjecture being false in n=4 implies nothing => about the existence of exotic spheres…
"Beautifully, all unfoldings of the 4-cube, 4-simplex, and 4-orthoplex are nets." why? is it a theorem or is it obvious?
Is not the main point of the article but the article cite another researcher saying that “Some archaea don’t even divide into two cells; they divide into three. There are many, many mysteries in archaea,” I googled it…
I would like to read more on this, do you have any further references?
Could you elaborate about how does the impossible trinity follows from (a) and (b)?