If only
Just so you know, these are the opinions of a crazy person. And when you share these opinions IRL amongst normal people, they absolutely secretly start to realize you’re a crazy person.
Yeah you’re a rube too. Easily tricked. Link 1: Zionism is racism, so that’s easy Link 2: just reporting on one dude’s opinion. Evidence of nothing. Link 3: more reporting on opinions by a laughably biased media…
Rube
Haha nope. It’s the opposite actually. They need to run candidates willing to say things that I agree with in order for me to vote for them.
Careful, they might ban you!
Maybe but are those limitations more or less onerous than the current requirements to contribute to scientific research? It remains to be seen I think.
When you can equally reasonably make the opposite argument - that AI is going to open up scientific exploration and contribution to a wider range of participants than ever before - then I think it’s a sign that nobody…
Gosh, it’s really so sad what has happened to you. Totally brainwashed. E: oh it’s a 1 day old account. Sad troll.
Sorry, are you suggesting that the CIA hasn’t done its best to prevent left-wing governments from succeeding in many cases? Because that would be very silly and ahistorical.
I have never seen anything like this. What kind of backdoors did it add to your code?
Is there any evidence though? Of the stolen credit cards being used by deepseek? You said there was “actual evidence”, what is it?
For any reason or no reason? I mean, that’s kind of the point I’m making. Countries disagree and have conflicts all the time. No country should be enabled to unilaterally cut off another’s internet in such cases
I don’t think that one country should get to unilaterally decide whether another country gets internet, no.
> I’ve now applied for over 3 dozen jobs and I’ve heard back from 24 of them with a rejection Sorry is this a troll? Go check out the SWE subreddits, people are sending out 1000s of applications before they get…
It’s CPC not CCP, and it’s not like I trust them specifically, but they’ve certainly done less to make me distrust them than my government (USA).
I agree it makes sense in the context of warning people not to short something. But what I am replying to is a person using it generally, not in the context of shorting, to just say “it only looks like I’m wrong because…
> the market can stay gullible, for longer than you stay solvent. This is essentially just what people say when current reality is different from what they want it to be. Sort of an unfalsifiable escape hatch response…
> If you have the will, but not the resources, you can rally people to your cause. You can try to find like-minded individuals with shared goals and with your collective resources, you can build influence. No offense…
Concentration of capital is absolutely an inherent truth to capitalism. This is not even a debate it’s a (social) scientific fact.
Those groups are representing people, and yes, in an ideal world, in which politicians simply represent their constituents, they would be unnecessary. In a democracy, public policy is supposed to reflect public opinion.…
If we define lobbying as using your financial resources and/or political connections (which others lack) to successfully influence policy, then of course it’s corruption. It’s a non-level playing field. Disclosure or…
Sounds very complicated and onerous. Any idea why the company would go through all of that process?
AFAIK there is no such explicit, company-wide effort at meta. The article seems to try to slip Meta in there with whatever reporting they are doing on Microsoft, despite there being no such evidence for meta. To also…
Every time I read one of these types of posts, I never have any idea what the author is talking about.
If only
Just so you know, these are the opinions of a crazy person. And when you share these opinions IRL amongst normal people, they absolutely secretly start to realize you’re a crazy person.
Yeah you’re a rube too. Easily tricked. Link 1: Zionism is racism, so that’s easy Link 2: just reporting on one dude’s opinion. Evidence of nothing. Link 3: more reporting on opinions by a laughably biased media…
Rube
Haha nope. It’s the opposite actually. They need to run candidates willing to say things that I agree with in order for me to vote for them.
Careful, they might ban you!
Maybe but are those limitations more or less onerous than the current requirements to contribute to scientific research? It remains to be seen I think.
When you can equally reasonably make the opposite argument - that AI is going to open up scientific exploration and contribution to a wider range of participants than ever before - then I think it’s a sign that nobody…
Gosh, it’s really so sad what has happened to you. Totally brainwashed. E: oh it’s a 1 day old account. Sad troll.
Sorry, are you suggesting that the CIA hasn’t done its best to prevent left-wing governments from succeeding in many cases? Because that would be very silly and ahistorical.
I have never seen anything like this. What kind of backdoors did it add to your code?
Is there any evidence though? Of the stolen credit cards being used by deepseek? You said there was “actual evidence”, what is it?
For any reason or no reason? I mean, that’s kind of the point I’m making. Countries disagree and have conflicts all the time. No country should be enabled to unilaterally cut off another’s internet in such cases
I don’t think that one country should get to unilaterally decide whether another country gets internet, no.
> I’ve now applied for over 3 dozen jobs and I’ve heard back from 24 of them with a rejection Sorry is this a troll? Go check out the SWE subreddits, people are sending out 1000s of applications before they get…
It’s CPC not CCP, and it’s not like I trust them specifically, but they’ve certainly done less to make me distrust them than my government (USA).
I agree it makes sense in the context of warning people not to short something. But what I am replying to is a person using it generally, not in the context of shorting, to just say “it only looks like I’m wrong because…
> the market can stay gullible, for longer than you stay solvent. This is essentially just what people say when current reality is different from what they want it to be. Sort of an unfalsifiable escape hatch response…
> If you have the will, but not the resources, you can rally people to your cause. You can try to find like-minded individuals with shared goals and with your collective resources, you can build influence. No offense…
Concentration of capital is absolutely an inherent truth to capitalism. This is not even a debate it’s a (social) scientific fact.
Those groups are representing people, and yes, in an ideal world, in which politicians simply represent their constituents, they would be unnecessary. In a democracy, public policy is supposed to reflect public opinion.…
If we define lobbying as using your financial resources and/or political connections (which others lack) to successfully influence policy, then of course it’s corruption. It’s a non-level playing field. Disclosure or…
Sounds very complicated and onerous. Any idea why the company would go through all of that process?
AFAIK there is no such explicit, company-wide effort at meta. The article seems to try to slip Meta in there with whatever reporting they are doing on Microsoft, despite there being no such evidence for meta. To also…
Every time I read one of these types of posts, I never have any idea what the author is talking about.