Not really, with all the radioactive fertiliser they use to grow american tabacco I'm surprised its not more. Doesnt apply to places not full of retards that use radioactive high phosphate fertiliser in their…
i think you are confusing appearence with physical existance. much like the eu that thinks they can apply their laws and taxes to a world where reincarnation is a "real" thing available at a few clicks of a keyboard.…
every website is a law unto only itself, every connection breaks the "physical" limits of national borders. the cat is out of the bag and the old powers that be have no power to keep their human slaves on the farm.…
i think you are confounding corporations as physical, "real" organisations in the real world, and cyberspace, which has no nationality by design and where the old world order is not welcome. The old world order would…
google will still be able to sell those 500mil eye balls with or without putting the money back into the eu. Those eyeballs will still be worth the same. it will make as much difference to google use as the us copyright…
google is just finishing its restructuring to xxvi holdings, apple has had all its cash outside of the us for quite some time.
and the required tax is paid on those physical good and services. nothing to do with google or 0s and 1s.
biggest ones that immediately springs to mind is C&A and pfiser in the UK. the UK and US auto industries in general, manufacturing in general. Google left the US. So did Apple. In fact, are there any multinationals left…
google would still charge the same to display an ad exactly the same number of people will see google ads exactly the same number of people will click on an ad The only thing that would change is companies outside of…
"they have a legal option not todo do business in europe" Do you see any way to do that other than to prevent eu businesses buying ads from google? Because i think that might have a few severe unintented consequences…
thats what the bitcoin detractors said, didnt work out to well for them did it? and anyway, even if you limit it to "real economy" (if anything in cyberspace can really be counted as real, which is highly suspect) it…
What gives the EU the right to think they can tax our networks? Do they not realise that trying to do so will just drive all digital revenue to places that don't?
Not really, with all the radioactive fertiliser they use to grow american tabacco I'm surprised its not more. Doesnt apply to places not full of retards that use radioactive high phosphate fertiliser in their…
i think you are confusing appearence with physical existance. much like the eu that thinks they can apply their laws and taxes to a world where reincarnation is a "real" thing available at a few clicks of a keyboard.…
every website is a law unto only itself, every connection breaks the "physical" limits of national borders. the cat is out of the bag and the old powers that be have no power to keep their human slaves on the farm.…
i think you are confounding corporations as physical, "real" organisations in the real world, and cyberspace, which has no nationality by design and where the old world order is not welcome. The old world order would…
google will still be able to sell those 500mil eye balls with or without putting the money back into the eu. Those eyeballs will still be worth the same. it will make as much difference to google use as the us copyright…
google is just finishing its restructuring to xxvi holdings, apple has had all its cash outside of the us for quite some time.
and the required tax is paid on those physical good and services. nothing to do with google or 0s and 1s.
biggest ones that immediately springs to mind is C&A and pfiser in the UK. the UK and US auto industries in general, manufacturing in general. Google left the US. So did Apple. In fact, are there any multinationals left…
google would still charge the same to display an ad exactly the same number of people will see google ads exactly the same number of people will click on an ad The only thing that would change is companies outside of…
"they have a legal option not todo do business in europe" Do you see any way to do that other than to prevent eu businesses buying ads from google? Because i think that might have a few severe unintented consequences…
thats what the bitcoin detractors said, didnt work out to well for them did it? and anyway, even if you limit it to "real economy" (if anything in cyberspace can really be counted as real, which is highly suspect) it…
What gives the EU the right to think they can tax our networks? Do they not realise that trying to do so will just drive all digital revenue to places that don't?