> if you control an almost omnipotent genie I think this is the major hole in the argument, and in the "AI maximalism" position you present. There is no such thing as an omnipotent genie, or a magic eight ball that can…
It's more obnoxious, but less creepy. They're not really bad in the same way.
Do you mean (((x)h)g)f ? since the order in which things happen is "h first, then g, then f"
Of course that depends on your principle. There are lots of ways of justifying the same behaviour, of course. the principle I had in mind was "A remote server has no right to determine how you consume the data it sends…
> You wouldn't refuse to even look at the code of a colleague who has ever made a coding mistake, would you? Not sure that is the position you're arguing with. I would refuse to skip code review for any colleague, no…
Legislation that prevented US companies from using open weight models would have the desired effect. They're the only people paying for AI anyway.
Of course not. The point is that you will not do the research as well without the social activity. If you hate social activity, fine, but if you don't, then you should do it.
"Pacing the frontier" means "implementing regulatory capture". They don't necessarily care about preventing open weight models from existing, just on preventing the people with money from being able to make use of them.
What in the slop? "The data to ink ratio is the ratio of data to ink. The data to ink ratio can be increased by decreasing the amount of ink. Decreasing the ink, while keeping the data constant, will increase the data…
> Jesus Christ. I’ve heard that Cambridge University has an open position in their school of education . . . this kind of thing would fit in very well there, no? What a disgusting, tasteless joke.
> We solved [trivial problem]. We will surely solve [incomparably harder problem]. Based on what? This will not happen!
Why do you think having a free public competitor would solve the problem? Did you think about the problem at all before posting this?
Because removing public content from the internet for profit is wrong and shouldn't be allowed. One man, or one company, should not be in charge of the free speech of half a billion people.
I jailbroke my kindle and this was what the guide I followed installed. I don't know what else is available! My experience has been "fine" - I don't use anything fancy like dictionary lookup or OCR, I just put…
>>> Hospitals have an operating margin of 2-5%. Medicare pays 50% less than private insurance. The hospital can be paid less without reducing their margin if they can remove a cost from their balance sheet. It does not…
They are already playing as dirty as possible.
Nazi Germany?
How many leadership meetings have you been in where some profitable approach was refused on an ethical basis? (rather than the basis that behaving ethically is actually more profitable, which is totally different) By…
Many people have strong morals, and might resist profit-maximising behaviours, but they will be outcompeted and replaced by less scrupulous people. There is actually no sharp difference between a person and a…
Which perspective? I said two things.
Hasn't that already happened?
You can't parse [X]HTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML.
Excited to see the price of every other product they offer triple for no reason.
> Karpathy described it as a form of coding where you "fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists" If that's not "turning your brain off", what is?
By that logic every appeal to the truth is a No True Scotsman fallacy.
> if you control an almost omnipotent genie I think this is the major hole in the argument, and in the "AI maximalism" position you present. There is no such thing as an omnipotent genie, or a magic eight ball that can…
It's more obnoxious, but less creepy. They're not really bad in the same way.
Do you mean (((x)h)g)f ? since the order in which things happen is "h first, then g, then f"
Of course that depends on your principle. There are lots of ways of justifying the same behaviour, of course. the principle I had in mind was "A remote server has no right to determine how you consume the data it sends…
> You wouldn't refuse to even look at the code of a colleague who has ever made a coding mistake, would you? Not sure that is the position you're arguing with. I would refuse to skip code review for any colleague, no…
Legislation that prevented US companies from using open weight models would have the desired effect. They're the only people paying for AI anyway.
Of course not. The point is that you will not do the research as well without the social activity. If you hate social activity, fine, but if you don't, then you should do it.
"Pacing the frontier" means "implementing regulatory capture". They don't necessarily care about preventing open weight models from existing, just on preventing the people with money from being able to make use of them.
What in the slop? "The data to ink ratio is the ratio of data to ink. The data to ink ratio can be increased by decreasing the amount of ink. Decreasing the ink, while keeping the data constant, will increase the data…
> Jesus Christ. I’ve heard that Cambridge University has an open position in their school of education . . . this kind of thing would fit in very well there, no? What a disgusting, tasteless joke.
> We solved [trivial problem]. We will surely solve [incomparably harder problem]. Based on what? This will not happen!
Why do you think having a free public competitor would solve the problem? Did you think about the problem at all before posting this?
Because removing public content from the internet for profit is wrong and shouldn't be allowed. One man, or one company, should not be in charge of the free speech of half a billion people.
I jailbroke my kindle and this was what the guide I followed installed. I don't know what else is available! My experience has been "fine" - I don't use anything fancy like dictionary lookup or OCR, I just put…
>>> Hospitals have an operating margin of 2-5%. Medicare pays 50% less than private insurance. The hospital can be paid less without reducing their margin if they can remove a cost from their balance sheet. It does not…
They are already playing as dirty as possible.
Nazi Germany?
How many leadership meetings have you been in where some profitable approach was refused on an ethical basis? (rather than the basis that behaving ethically is actually more profitable, which is totally different) By…
Many people have strong morals, and might resist profit-maximising behaviours, but they will be outcompeted and replaced by less scrupulous people. There is actually no sharp difference between a person and a…
Which perspective? I said two things.
Hasn't that already happened?
You can't parse [X]HTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML.
Excited to see the price of every other product they offer triple for no reason.
> Karpathy described it as a form of coding where you "fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists" If that's not "turning your brain off", what is?
By that logic every appeal to the truth is a No True Scotsman fallacy.