That is not an innocent explanation, any more than someone breaking into your house to adjust your thermostat.
Same reason people give postgres, php, or any other program a user account.
The comment I'm replying to said "no skill is involved", not "less skill is involved".
I don't understand this comment at all. "At least 1000 words" would require at least the skills of writing decently & writing a moderate amount based on little. I get that getting to exactly 1000 requires some skill,…
Did you read beyond the first sentence? This reply makes no sense if you read the whole comment.
> 3d printing control laws that are being passed in NY The "don't print guns" laws? What lobby would that be? I actually agree that the US is very vulnerable to lobbying and that 3d printing restrictions are dumb, but I…
> i dont think there is any software on the planet that i would consider "truly life changing" I don't think there is any software on the planet that has accumulated 1.5 trillion dollars of otherwise-useful money!
Please explain. That is exactly what the linked case established.
For someone who finds this "not unintuitive" you sure are confused! "Just like I can learn from a book" - ok. Are you allowed to go to libgen and download a book in order to learn from it, because learning is a fair use?
You have to admit that "downloading every book ever written for free from a repository of books that is itself illegal to compile and to run, in order to write a text generation tool" being legal is at least…
The code is not eligible for copyright. If they do not give you a copy of the source code, that does not matter. And if you don't know which parts were generated by LLM, you can't safely reuse the code.
I don't think I would conclude you're a moron. I don't think you really "hold everything in your mind's eye" when you understand something. I don't know how I do it or how it really works (nobody does). But the fact…
I read and understand the code using my brain, by constructing a mental model and reasoning about it. An AI can't do this because they don't have mental models and don't do reasoning.
I seriously thought this was a joke the first time I read it. Are people really able to work like this, understanding nothing and just poking the machine until it does your job for you?
This reply is so far removed from the comment you replied to I'm worried you replied to the wrong one. They did not mention anything about people who haven't built anything, startups with no users, and having no…
> He’s described Ruby’s design as starting from a simple Lisp, stripping out macros and s-expressions Put the macros back! It would be so cool!
He only really addresses the fact that the system can be nasty. It can be and regularly is, but he only argues that a company doesn't have to be nasty, so he can conveniently ignore specific examples. But the system is…
But "earning" does not mean "obtain without cheating"! Nobody (that I have spoken to) speaks of earning their lottery winnings. The claim is that owning a company worth a billion dollars is more like winning the lottery…
But tokens are just text! Isn't it all just text? If you're training and you encounter "the", is that an instruction "the" or a data "the"?
Yes, it's a serious problem. It's why we remove humans from these systems whenever possible!
What does this mean, actually? If you are imagining that blue tokens are just words, maybe the "token space" is just all things that we agree might be words, what are the red tokens? Are they not text? You could maybe…
> You can't guarantee an LLM does anything. Agreed. > But that doesn't mean that separation between instructions and data is impossible. Yes it does! The comments you are replying to are concerned that it is not…
Everyone can imagine some experiences. No-one can imagine every experience. Why are you so sure you know what it's like to be a bat? Do you know how a bat works, how its brain generates sensations, how different sensory…
Probably daylight savings
Hopefully this will also include human-generated content with AI scripts, which are not that hard to detect but require a certain amount of wasted time listening to the slop before I skip the video.
That is not an innocent explanation, any more than someone breaking into your house to adjust your thermostat.
Same reason people give postgres, php, or any other program a user account.
The comment I'm replying to said "no skill is involved", not "less skill is involved".
I don't understand this comment at all. "At least 1000 words" would require at least the skills of writing decently & writing a moderate amount based on little. I get that getting to exactly 1000 requires some skill,…
Did you read beyond the first sentence? This reply makes no sense if you read the whole comment.
> 3d printing control laws that are being passed in NY The "don't print guns" laws? What lobby would that be? I actually agree that the US is very vulnerable to lobbying and that 3d printing restrictions are dumb, but I…
> i dont think there is any software on the planet that i would consider "truly life changing" I don't think there is any software on the planet that has accumulated 1.5 trillion dollars of otherwise-useful money!
Please explain. That is exactly what the linked case established.
For someone who finds this "not unintuitive" you sure are confused! "Just like I can learn from a book" - ok. Are you allowed to go to libgen and download a book in order to learn from it, because learning is a fair use?
You have to admit that "downloading every book ever written for free from a repository of books that is itself illegal to compile and to run, in order to write a text generation tool" being legal is at least…
The code is not eligible for copyright. If they do not give you a copy of the source code, that does not matter. And if you don't know which parts were generated by LLM, you can't safely reuse the code.
I don't think I would conclude you're a moron. I don't think you really "hold everything in your mind's eye" when you understand something. I don't know how I do it or how it really works (nobody does). But the fact…
I read and understand the code using my brain, by constructing a mental model and reasoning about it. An AI can't do this because they don't have mental models and don't do reasoning.
I seriously thought this was a joke the first time I read it. Are people really able to work like this, understanding nothing and just poking the machine until it does your job for you?
This reply is so far removed from the comment you replied to I'm worried you replied to the wrong one. They did not mention anything about people who haven't built anything, startups with no users, and having no…
> He’s described Ruby’s design as starting from a simple Lisp, stripping out macros and s-expressions Put the macros back! It would be so cool!
He only really addresses the fact that the system can be nasty. It can be and regularly is, but he only argues that a company doesn't have to be nasty, so he can conveniently ignore specific examples. But the system is…
But "earning" does not mean "obtain without cheating"! Nobody (that I have spoken to) speaks of earning their lottery winnings. The claim is that owning a company worth a billion dollars is more like winning the lottery…
But tokens are just text! Isn't it all just text? If you're training and you encounter "the", is that an instruction "the" or a data "the"?
Yes, it's a serious problem. It's why we remove humans from these systems whenever possible!
What does this mean, actually? If you are imagining that blue tokens are just words, maybe the "token space" is just all things that we agree might be words, what are the red tokens? Are they not text? You could maybe…
> You can't guarantee an LLM does anything. Agreed. > But that doesn't mean that separation between instructions and data is impossible. Yes it does! The comments you are replying to are concerned that it is not…
Everyone can imagine some experiences. No-one can imagine every experience. Why are you so sure you know what it's like to be a bat? Do you know how a bat works, how its brain generates sensations, how different sensory…
Probably daylight savings
Hopefully this will also include human-generated content with AI scripts, which are not that hard to detect but require a certain amount of wasted time listening to the slop before I skip the video.