I think the photography patent they recently granted to Amazon is much more offensive.
Is anyone supposed to take this seriously? it seems like the author realised he didn't have the evidence to support outright accusations so he opted to scribble a few paragraphs of innuendo.
"crappy licensing deal" doesn't really indicate an even article. Basically same as everyone else they are siding with the labels and adapting their narrative. Yes, if Youtube can't licence the music the videos will get…
Youtube doesn't have a "EULA" they have a "TOS", and if the uploaded content is legal and doesn't infringe on copyright it stays up. Any allegations to the contrary would require proof on your part.
They are quoting one side of the negotiation that is trying to pressure youtube for better terms, "blocking" is their spin for youtube not agreeing to licence their videos for a higher rate thus resulting in them being…
These videos aren't being blocked, it's just that youtube will no longer have the license to show them, because those indie labels are holding for a better deal.
It isn't. The videos aren't being "blocked", youtube simply won't have the license to show them anymore. These "indie labels" are trying to extract higher rates from free streaming by holding out on the paid service.…
I think the photography patent they recently granted to Amazon is much more offensive.
Is anyone supposed to take this seriously? it seems like the author realised he didn't have the evidence to support outright accusations so he opted to scribble a few paragraphs of innuendo.
"crappy licensing deal" doesn't really indicate an even article. Basically same as everyone else they are siding with the labels and adapting their narrative. Yes, if Youtube can't licence the music the videos will get…
Youtube doesn't have a "EULA" they have a "TOS", and if the uploaded content is legal and doesn't infringe on copyright it stays up. Any allegations to the contrary would require proof on your part.
They are quoting one side of the negotiation that is trying to pressure youtube for better terms, "blocking" is their spin for youtube not agreeing to licence their videos for a higher rate thus resulting in them being…
These videos aren't being blocked, it's just that youtube will no longer have the license to show them, because those indie labels are holding for a better deal.
It isn't. The videos aren't being "blocked", youtube simply won't have the license to show them anymore. These "indie labels" are trying to extract higher rates from free streaming by holding out on the paid service.…