> Did you create this account only to comment on this story? (just curious) Yes i did, usually i just let certain topics pass by me and never comment here. RF-cavities though are the very core to my line of research, so…
Yes, and the is the point. NASA would have had the means to eliminate most of those sources of errors. I wouldn't call these measurement errors though -> the measurement is fine - your setup is the source of error. But…
I am blaming them for not being up to date on the state of the art and not following up on earlier research, especially on what has been hinted at in: https://tu-dresden.de/ing/maschinenwesen/ilr/rfs/ressourcen/...…
Thanks for posting a link to the paper!
There was a very elaborate experiment in Germany regarding this. They concluded that the force is excerted by coupling the RF-energy from the outside. If the system is fully self-contained (driven by a battery…
> Did you create this account only to comment on this story? (just curious) Yes i did, usually i just let certain topics pass by me and never comment here. RF-cavities though are the very core to my line of research, so…
Yes, and the is the point. NASA would have had the means to eliminate most of those sources of errors. I wouldn't call these measurement errors though -> the measurement is fine - your setup is the source of error. But…
I am blaming them for not being up to date on the state of the art and not following up on earlier research, especially on what has been hinted at in: https://tu-dresden.de/ing/maschinenwesen/ilr/rfs/ressourcen/...…
Thanks for posting a link to the paper!
There was a very elaborate experiment in Germany regarding this. They concluded that the force is excerted by coupling the RF-energy from the outside. If the system is fully self-contained (driven by a battery…