> This might not be true for much longer, maybe only a couple of decades. nobody can estimate out to decades. anyone who claim to be able to do so is a charlatan. > If this is in the top 10, it's damning with faint…
England didn't have the natural resources, population, geography, techno-centric culture to sustain its leadership. US does.
How about US 1.) having the biggest economy in the world, and growing 3% per year 2.) having the biggest worldly influential movie business 3.) having the biggest worldly influential video game business 4.) having 40%…
> This might not be true for much longer, maybe only a couple of decades. nobody can estimate out to decades. anyone who claim to be able to do so is a charlatan. > If this is in the top 10, it's damning with faint…
England didn't have the natural resources, population, geography, techno-centric culture to sustain its leadership. US does.
How about US 1.) having the biggest economy in the world, and growing 3% per year 2.) having the biggest worldly influential movie business 3.) having the biggest worldly influential video game business 4.) having 40%…