deltaninenine
No user record in our sample, but deltaninenine has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but deltaninenine has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
[dead]
[dead]
>Or just look at the votes on our comments. Votes are a popularity contest. I have a lot of downvotes. So you win the popularity contest. It's fine. Im ok with that. I'm more going for the correctness contest here.…
[dead]
No. You just mis expressed your point with a logical mistake. You wanted to explain why I can't find evidence for the Eliza effect on HN, but you didn't realize that it contradicts your overall point of the effect. I…
Don't actually understand your joke here.
When you delete things from your hard drive that fits the definition of making your computer forget something. Look up the definition of forget. It is not a human exclusive action. Therefore it is not…
>That's repeated a lot but it's not entirely accurate. No one can explain how an LLM gives the answers it does (not even the LLM). Uh I literally said no one fully understands these networks. And you go on to say that…
>Bing search and customer service chatbots, for example, give a layer of indirection There is no layer of indirection you are directly chatting with the AI. You are not having a third party describing his experience…
>doesn't actually happen often enough to care about. That's my entire point. It doesn't happen often enough to care about. Sounds like you have some anecdotal experience of it happening to your entire family and a lot…
>A significant portion of the American population doesn't accept the results of the 2020 election. No amount of proof will change their mind. This is different. There's obvious bias here. Many people don't want to…
>Some experts, and lots of people who have not themselves built LLMs, such as Elon Musk, Yuval Noah Harari, Steve Wozniak. Never denied this. I did not intentionally hide this. I will say your statement did not mention…
That's just your opinion. I say we need to prove this out. If a significant portion of the tech and non techy population anthropomorphized LLMs to the point where they don't understand that LLMs hallucinate then surely…
>Future editions of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds will have long chapters about crypto and AI. If you think most people understand the tech and its limitations and don't act according to…
>People’s susceptibility to anthropomorphizing an even slightly convincing computer program has been known since ELIZA, one of the first chatbots, in 1966. It’s called the ELIZA effect. I'm tired of these arguments.…
The problem is this type of intelligence is hard to define or quantify. Its like asking the question " what is art and what is not art". Data driven hiring practices require hard definitions. One of these hard…
I'm referring to the public. Not the submission.
>The wisdom of the ages speaks of being ten times better. This is an efficiency move. Cut the human out of the loop. Looks like the failure is less about creating an assembly line and more about creating a mobile…
Google it. Its well known.
Long term damage to liver. You use it long enough your liver will die. But it's too hard to do a causal analysis on this as the timelines are measured in decades.
It is true that in science nothing can be proven but this fact doesn't apply if you think in terms of statistics. Science is broad and doesn't always give answers in terms of a boolean falsification. You can be given a…
The GP didn't talk about a certain nuance and used evidence based medicine to cover all forms of science. A double blind placebo trial is the gold standard for testing causality. We don't have to go that far. We can use…
Don't characterize the public as that stupid. The current risks of AI are startling clear to a layman. The extinction level even is more far fetched to a layman. You are the public and your viewpoint is aligned with the…
It is technically biased. But biased towards truth.
Logical Induction has been successful in predicting future events.