[flagged]
Ofc nobody reads papers saying your methods are trash; if they read it they simply ignore it. Fwiw Pearson correlation does not assume normally distributed variables, what people usually mean is homoscedascity…
completely self-taught use of ChatGPT, i assume
i was under the impression that DG adult neurogenesis was pretty much settled? is there any controversy abt this?
fyi many state-of-the-art statistical libraries exist (or are properly maintained) in R only
For anyone interested in actual neurocomputational theories I can highly recommend the work of Friedemann Pulvermueller. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030100821...
[flagged]
Ofc nobody reads papers saying your methods are trash; if they read it they simply ignore it. Fwiw Pearson correlation does not assume normally distributed variables, what people usually mean is homoscedascity…
completely self-taught use of ChatGPT, i assume
i was under the impression that DG adult neurogenesis was pretty much settled? is there any controversy abt this?
fyi many state-of-the-art statistical libraries exist (or are properly maintained) in R only
For anyone interested in actual neurocomputational theories I can highly recommend the work of Friedemann Pulvermueller. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030100821...