Betting places like polymarket even the playfield. The gambling industry is rigged. Decentralized venues make it fair for everyone to bet
Since when betting is forbidden? It's not like they are socialists with a net worth of hundreds of millions
they just reported 1B from crypto ventures, so 57m seems like lunch money...
Again: None of the described above makes sense. Why would a gay furry shoot someone because he is not radical enough? You have everyone who knew the guy saying that he was very left-wing. Also, try to check some of the…
[flagged]
highly unlikely some young guy who had a relationship with his roommate who is a transexual both being furries are right-wing. Also, highly unlikely a right-wing is going to shoot another right-wing because he is not…
yeah, being a gay furry doesn't have much to do with being right-wing afaik
"free speech absolutists" that will defend anything that benefits their narrative but not others'
> And do they? In practice? The theory is always sweet Yes, they have access to the same economy. > you have one more voice asking a centralized organization for protection, maybe with some regulation I don't want…
> There is a fee, quite high in fact, and energy cost. Depends on the L1 that you use. If you think of BTC, yeah, fee could be high (not if you are sending 1M), if you think of a proof-of-stake L1 then not much. Also…
I don't see how a trustless & decentralized system would cause feudalism. On the other hand, I see how our current "democratic" system evokes in neo-feudalism. We are all slaves to the government and the few…
Which one are you referring to? What do you want to get all the freedom in the world and no effort for running a decentralized node? Staking blockchains don't require much resources.
Tell third-world countries that centralization is good :) Centralization could be good, sometimes (if it works idk). The problem is that the financial world has been monopolized by certain entities and the barrier of…
nah
but does mycoria work with NATs?
Is this like tailscale?
problems are the same but decentralized. You can't give a mortgage to an anonymous user, can you?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecunia_non_olet
> Too many smart people work on these pointless projects instead of useful tech that benefits society Decentralization doesn't benefit society? umh...
But that also happens in the fiat system, so where's the flaw in crypto?
Thus, other blockchains emerged
memecoins have nothing to do with BTC. Talk about the price was always a thing because BTC is a currency, thus price is key. The tech is good, or it was at the time. I don't see the case for money laundering in BTC,…
isn't most of the payoff from stock? which means that if the CEO gets a payoff it's because he is unlocking & selling stock to the market?
This is the reason a lot of europeans are choosing to leave Europe seeking refuge somewhere else more free :)
Betting places like polymarket even the playfield. The gambling industry is rigged. Decentralized venues make it fair for everyone to bet
Since when betting is forbidden? It's not like they are socialists with a net worth of hundreds of millions
they just reported 1B from crypto ventures, so 57m seems like lunch money...
Again: None of the described above makes sense. Why would a gay furry shoot someone because he is not radical enough? You have everyone who knew the guy saying that he was very left-wing. Also, try to check some of the…
[flagged]
highly unlikely some young guy who had a relationship with his roommate who is a transexual both being furries are right-wing. Also, highly unlikely a right-wing is going to shoot another right-wing because he is not…
yeah, being a gay furry doesn't have much to do with being right-wing afaik
"free speech absolutists" that will defend anything that benefits their narrative but not others'
[flagged]
> And do they? In practice? The theory is always sweet Yes, they have access to the same economy. > you have one more voice asking a centralized organization for protection, maybe with some regulation I don't want…
> There is a fee, quite high in fact, and energy cost. Depends on the L1 that you use. If you think of BTC, yeah, fee could be high (not if you are sending 1M), if you think of a proof-of-stake L1 then not much. Also…
I don't see how a trustless & decentralized system would cause feudalism. On the other hand, I see how our current "democratic" system evokes in neo-feudalism. We are all slaves to the government and the few…
Which one are you referring to? What do you want to get all the freedom in the world and no effort for running a decentralized node? Staking blockchains don't require much resources.
Tell third-world countries that centralization is good :) Centralization could be good, sometimes (if it works idk). The problem is that the financial world has been monopolized by certain entities and the barrier of…
nah
but does mycoria work with NATs?
Is this like tailscale?
problems are the same but decentralized. You can't give a mortgage to an anonymous user, can you?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecunia_non_olet
> Too many smart people work on these pointless projects instead of useful tech that benefits society Decentralization doesn't benefit society? umh...
But that also happens in the fiat system, so where's the flaw in crypto?
Thus, other blockchains emerged
memecoins have nothing to do with BTC. Talk about the price was always a thing because BTC is a currency, thus price is key. The tech is good, or it was at the time. I don't see the case for money laundering in BTC,…
isn't most of the payoff from stock? which means that if the CEO gets a payoff it's because he is unlocking & selling stock to the market?
This is the reason a lot of europeans are choosing to leave Europe seeking refuge somewhere else more free :)