Perhaps. But that doesn’t make her action any less so. She’s not a victim. She made a choice (which I personally agree with and find admirable) but the firing seems justifiable.
IMO the problem was putting the pop up on the IRI consultants website. She wasn’t protecting anyone or informing anyone of policy, she was being inflammatory and I don’t see it as a stretch for G to say she abused her…
I’m happy to see this comment. I guess I don’t really care if Google wants to succumb to NIH syndrome and build this themselves, but they should at least acknowledge the person whose idea they are repackaging.
No they went and rolled their own in true Google fashion
wtf are Other Bets?
There’s a company restaurant?
I must work at the same place
Omg could you imagine the toddler sitting there, waiting for a request and then banging out a random password of the right length
It literally says it’s going to send links to Google Safe Browsing and Tencent Safe Browsing in the Safari setting page under “Safari and Privacy”
Perhaps. But that doesn’t make her action any less so. She’s not a victim. She made a choice (which I personally agree with and find admirable) but the firing seems justifiable.
IMO the problem was putting the pop up on the IRI consultants website. She wasn’t protecting anyone or informing anyone of policy, she was being inflammatory and I don’t see it as a stretch for G to say she abused her…
I’m happy to see this comment. I guess I don’t really care if Google wants to succumb to NIH syndrome and build this themselves, but they should at least acknowledge the person whose idea they are repackaging.
No they went and rolled their own in true Google fashion
wtf are Other Bets?
There’s a company restaurant?
I must work at the same place
Omg could you imagine the toddler sitting there, waiting for a request and then banging out a random password of the right length
It literally says it’s going to send links to Google Safe Browsing and Tencent Safe Browsing in the Safari setting page under “Safari and Privacy”