Given how easy it is to hide conflict of interest when presenting findings, I’d say it’s commenters jobs to criticize the source This is forever human stuff, using a computer does nothing to remove bias if the inputs…
My take as a 90s math grad (out of touch with modern teaching): Theory is useful to show human society is stagnant. There’s an infinite number of sentences but our ML models are having tons of “success” as society…
You implemented an entirely novel system. Somehow that’s lazy? Weird priority maybe. Sounds like more effort was involved than just using functionality that’s there.
Given how easy it is to hide conflict of interest when presenting findings, I’d say it’s commenters jobs to criticize the source This is forever human stuff, using a computer does nothing to remove bias if the inputs…
My take as a 90s math grad (out of touch with modern teaching): Theory is useful to show human society is stagnant. There’s an infinite number of sentences but our ML models are having tons of “success” as society…
You implemented an entirely novel system. Somehow that’s lazy? Weird priority maybe. Sounds like more effort was involved than just using functionality that’s there.