Anyone can fake a website. Can you prove that they show the real Neuralink website?
It's actually amazing that Neuralink can use this badly distorted data. I imagine that fixing the A/D would improve their results dramatically -- lower latency and higher precision. Why Neuralink has continued work with…
Bogus. But a nice spoof.
Analyzing the data it becomes clear that the A/D used by Neuralink is defective, i.e. very poor accuracy. The A/D introduces a huge amount of distortion, which in practice manifests as noise. Until this A/D linearity…
Neuralink should skip the compression, and replace the radio link with optics. A tiny embedded LED can transmit data optically at the required speed, without compression, and a second transceiver outside the body, with…
Check out this link for background info. https://mikaelhaji.medium.com/a-technical-deep-dive-on-elon-...
Sorry, corrected an error. It's 2275X That's the compression ratio for complete cross correlation. It's (10 bits uncompressed / 4.5 bits compressed on 1 channel) * 1024 channels
200X is possible. The sample data compresses poorly, getting down to 4.5 bits per sample easily with very simple first-order difference encoding and an decent Huffman coder. However, lets assume there is massive…
Anyone can fake a website. Can you prove that they show the real Neuralink website?
It's actually amazing that Neuralink can use this badly distorted data. I imagine that fixing the A/D would improve their results dramatically -- lower latency and higher precision. Why Neuralink has continued work with…
Bogus. But a nice spoof.
Analyzing the data it becomes clear that the A/D used by Neuralink is defective, i.e. very poor accuracy. The A/D introduces a huge amount of distortion, which in practice manifests as noise. Until this A/D linearity…
Neuralink should skip the compression, and replace the radio link with optics. A tiny embedded LED can transmit data optically at the required speed, without compression, and a second transceiver outside the body, with…
Check out this link for background info. https://mikaelhaji.medium.com/a-technical-deep-dive-on-elon-...
Sorry, corrected an error. It's 2275X That's the compression ratio for complete cross correlation. It's (10 bits uncompressed / 4.5 bits compressed on 1 channel) * 1024 channels
200X is possible. The sample data compresses poorly, getting down to 4.5 bits per sample easily with very simple first-order difference encoding and an decent Huffman coder. However, lets assume there is massive…