I wish this as well. I make a userdebug build myself to get adb root, which isn't difficult, but would be a lot nicer if it were officially supported.
TikTok and Instagram seem to be doing just fine..
For the last 6 months or so, Grok had been the most consistent for me, especially for anything that relies heavily on search.
If there is sexual activity involving a minor, yes, the parents should be able to pursue criminal and civil cases. Solicitation without any actions doesn't seem that important.
Well that's an inherent problem of having multiple people with custody of a single child. Ideally a compromise can be reached, but in extreme cases I suppose it could end up with litigation. But still, this is a private…
I don't agree that anything can be objectively harmful. I personally agree that it is harmful for minors up to some age. So again I would maintain it's the parents' responsibility to protect them until they reach that…
Doing dumb stuff and experimenting as a teenager is part of growing up. I don't see anything wrong with that.
> Does this logic extend to other things society has deemed vices? Yes. When a child is too young, parents should be directly preventing access to those vices. As their children get older, parents should have instilled…
Its subjectivity is a fact, so no research required.
If there are good reasons to restrict them, I'd expect them to deal with it. I never had access to cable television or video games growing up, while nearly all my classmates did. It wasn't a big deal.
It's pretty trivial to block access to certain sites or apps. Or better yet, you raise your kids well so that you don't need to rely on technology to keep them away from bad things.
Stealing from anyone is already illegal, so that's not relevant here. And I don't think kids seeing porn is particularly harmful.
Yes. What scenario did you have in mind?
What? I'm saying the government shouldn't be involved in bans at all. It should be up to the individual or their legal guardians.
I'd much rather be able to simply rsync the data folder for all apps on my phone without having the hardware KeyStore breaking backups installed on another device.
Harm is subjective and I'd much rather parents make that call than the government. And there absolutely isn't consensus on when it's harmful to give children alcohol. Many would say it's good to give a child a glass of…
The responsibility to protect children should be put on their parents. If they want to give their children devices to use unsupervised, then they should block access to whatever they deem harmful.
Checkpoints, no. Searches with a warrant, yes.
Only if they happen to know the connection between you and the seller's wallet addresses and your respective identities. Almost all the crypto I have is from p2p or freelancing. Very few could connect my identity and my…
Yes, I think everyone should be able to exchange payments freely. Drugs should be legal, so that's not a problem. Terrorism and human trafficking are more complicated topics, but basically I think they should be…
The alternative is the freedom to make any financial transaction without the government being involved. If your concern is effective taxation, there are plenty of methods that worked historically while preserving…
Good. AML/KYC laws are a huge abuse of state power.
I disagree. I'd wager that state of the art LLMs can beat out of the average doctor at diagnosis given a detailed list of symptoms, especially for conditions the doctor doesn't see on a regular basis.
The boundaries between groups may be blurred, but surely a person whose ancestors lived in location A for the last 10 thousand years will be genetically more similar om average to other people from that location than to…
Aren't there already large long-living animals like elephants that basically don't get cancer?
I wish this as well. I make a userdebug build myself to get adb root, which isn't difficult, but would be a lot nicer if it were officially supported.
TikTok and Instagram seem to be doing just fine..
For the last 6 months or so, Grok had been the most consistent for me, especially for anything that relies heavily on search.
If there is sexual activity involving a minor, yes, the parents should be able to pursue criminal and civil cases. Solicitation without any actions doesn't seem that important.
Well that's an inherent problem of having multiple people with custody of a single child. Ideally a compromise can be reached, but in extreme cases I suppose it could end up with litigation. But still, this is a private…
I don't agree that anything can be objectively harmful. I personally agree that it is harmful for minors up to some age. So again I would maintain it's the parents' responsibility to protect them until they reach that…
Doing dumb stuff and experimenting as a teenager is part of growing up. I don't see anything wrong with that.
> Does this logic extend to other things society has deemed vices? Yes. When a child is too young, parents should be directly preventing access to those vices. As their children get older, parents should have instilled…
Its subjectivity is a fact, so no research required.
If there are good reasons to restrict them, I'd expect them to deal with it. I never had access to cable television or video games growing up, while nearly all my classmates did. It wasn't a big deal.
It's pretty trivial to block access to certain sites or apps. Or better yet, you raise your kids well so that you don't need to rely on technology to keep them away from bad things.
Stealing from anyone is already illegal, so that's not relevant here. And I don't think kids seeing porn is particularly harmful.
Yes. What scenario did you have in mind?
What? I'm saying the government shouldn't be involved in bans at all. It should be up to the individual or their legal guardians.
I'd much rather be able to simply rsync the data folder for all apps on my phone without having the hardware KeyStore breaking backups installed on another device.
Harm is subjective and I'd much rather parents make that call than the government. And there absolutely isn't consensus on when it's harmful to give children alcohol. Many would say it's good to give a child a glass of…
The responsibility to protect children should be put on their parents. If they want to give their children devices to use unsupervised, then they should block access to whatever they deem harmful.
Checkpoints, no. Searches with a warrant, yes.
Only if they happen to know the connection between you and the seller's wallet addresses and your respective identities. Almost all the crypto I have is from p2p or freelancing. Very few could connect my identity and my…
Yes, I think everyone should be able to exchange payments freely. Drugs should be legal, so that's not a problem. Terrorism and human trafficking are more complicated topics, but basically I think they should be…
The alternative is the freedom to make any financial transaction without the government being involved. If your concern is effective taxation, there are plenty of methods that worked historically while preserving…
Good. AML/KYC laws are a huge abuse of state power.
I disagree. I'd wager that state of the art LLMs can beat out of the average doctor at diagnosis given a detailed list of symptoms, especially for conditions the doctor doesn't see on a regular basis.
The boundaries between groups may be blurred, but surely a person whose ancestors lived in location A for the last 10 thousand years will be genetically more similar om average to other people from that location than to…
Aren't there already large long-living animals like elephants that basically don't get cancer?