Not if your definition of health includes reproduction.
Mutual aid, same as any other problem. Presumably if there aren’t the resources or people or they deserve not having kids they won’t. Anything else is hard to justify at all.
Health stuff, including IVF, should not be crowd funded. These are by definition universal problems that will be addressed most efficiently collectively. The question of what reproduction society should support is…
Any alternative to employees is even more inhumane and enables explicit exploitation, as uber and lyft do (aka the gig economy). What would you suggest as a meaning for this third type of workin class?
Most of the affected people aren’t employees. Who cares about the company more than their workers?
Not if your definition of health includes reproduction.
Mutual aid, same as any other problem. Presumably if there aren’t the resources or people or they deserve not having kids they won’t. Anything else is hard to justify at all.
Health stuff, including IVF, should not be crowd funded. These are by definition universal problems that will be addressed most efficiently collectively. The question of what reproduction society should support is…
Any alternative to employees is even more inhumane and enables explicit exploitation, as uber and lyft do (aka the gig economy). What would you suggest as a meaning for this third type of workin class?
Most of the affected people aren’t employees. Who cares about the company more than their workers?