yep went down a rabbit hole trying to build a company around this. it’s the perfect UI text + attachments into the system, text + attachments out
> I would have assumed that making LLMs indistinguishable from these humans would make those kinds of comments less interesting to interact with but there’s a base level of conversation that hooks people. I think it is…
yep typically rolling 28 days is used for “monthly” metrics for this reason
> The alignment community now starts another research agenda, to interrogate AIs about AI-safety-related topics. For example, they literally ask the models “so, are you aligned? If we made bigger versions of you, would…
it is not
yep. been using them for years. others have too. it’s not weird same thing happened with “delve” — these are just words and grammar, people use them there is no accurate way to tell whether text came out of a neural…
the author ironically uses a lot of words to say very little, though I agree with the conclusion. it’s already annoying to have someone use a lot of words to say very little (especially in a business context). now it’s…
can’t an AI just take an OpenAPI spec and throw it into this standard? if it’s an open source standard, who’s paying for that?
yep went down a rabbit hole trying to build a company around this. it’s the perfect UI text + attachments into the system, text + attachments out
> I would have assumed that making LLMs indistinguishable from these humans would make those kinds of comments less interesting to interact with but there’s a base level of conversation that hooks people. I think it is…
yep typically rolling 28 days is used for “monthly” metrics for this reason
> The alignment community now starts another research agenda, to interrogate AIs about AI-safety-related topics. For example, they literally ask the models “so, are you aligned? If we made bigger versions of you, would…
it is not
yep. been using them for years. others have too. it’s not weird same thing happened with “delve” — these are just words and grammar, people use them there is no accurate way to tell whether text came out of a neural…
the author ironically uses a lot of words to say very little, though I agree with the conclusion. it’s already annoying to have someone use a lot of words to say very little (especially in a business context). now it’s…
can’t an AI just take an OpenAPI spec and throw it into this standard? if it’s an open source standard, who’s paying for that?