Seems like they are just counting the weird features of languages. It is correct that language like Turkish (probably Hungarian as well) is least weird because it does not have any of the weird features like word…
For some reason they never say what percentage of (unique)queries are answered by which source though...
To me, authors decision to use terrible 3D graphs and non zero Y axis makes makes me suspicious of his other decisions and comments.
Yet you spilled them here on HN :)
The big problem I see with the project is that everone seems to be focused on hardware, which I think should be at the bottom of the the list to provide decent digital education system. Money should be spent on good…
Sorry to be skeptical, but I can't help but think: Number of "battery breakthrough" news I heard in the last 15 years: >100, Actual battery breakthroughs: 0
Care to support your theory with numbers and facts?
But like all other gadget - news site, comments section is a big turn off.
Unfortunately their performance comparison does not include modern memory allocators like tcmalloc or jemalloc.
Seems like they are just counting the weird features of languages. It is correct that language like Turkish (probably Hungarian as well) is least weird because it does not have any of the weird features like word…
For some reason they never say what percentage of (unique)queries are answered by which source though...
To me, authors decision to use terrible 3D graphs and non zero Y axis makes makes me suspicious of his other decisions and comments.
Yet you spilled them here on HN :)
The big problem I see with the project is that everone seems to be focused on hardware, which I think should be at the bottom of the the list to provide decent digital education system. Money should be spent on good…
Sorry to be skeptical, but I can't help but think: Number of "battery breakthrough" news I heard in the last 15 years: >100, Actual battery breakthroughs: 0
Care to support your theory with numbers and facts?
But like all other gadget - news site, comments section is a big turn off.
Unfortunately their performance comparison does not include modern memory allocators like tcmalloc or jemalloc.