RTFA and find out!
It achieves a theoretical lower bound on the complexity. This is what the article says in like 1000 words because it's written for mathematical illiterates.
Yes, lots of people do things that are bad ideas.
No, they are not. Reddit (and even more so Discord) does not have the permanence that forums have and far worse tools for formatting posts, so every subreddit degenerates into 101 questions, circlejerking, and meme…
Maybe it shouldn't be split up but burned, razed, and the ground salted so nothing will ever grow there again.
We used to have forums and blogs organised by interest topic or community. An elegant mode of organisation, for a more civilised age.
So vim but for finance?
You can @ the President of the United States on Twitter
Every time I come across a piece in that style I want to smash a screen. It could be a one-paragraph solution, but I have to scroll past three images and five paragraphs of worthless blather that assumes I'm a moron.…
Twitter has been orders of magnitude more harmful to society than any *chan and Twitter bluechecks should be thought of and treated like Twitter bluechecks think of and treat chan users. All those articles about how…
No, they did know for sure.
There's a reason RTFM was so prevalent, and we need to make it so, again.
No, Bethe and others knew in the 40s it could not have. Enough nuclear physics was known then to know that the atmosphere cannot be ignited by a nuke. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-telle...
Twitter weighs about a MB, a tweet is at most 280 characters, and typically of negative utility to the user and society. So yes.
Then why the fuck is the average website measured in megabytes
It's amazing that 3-4 seconds is considered a reasonable target in 2020 when 8 seconds was a target on freaking dialup. It's like having a Ferrari and considering outrunning a horse a success.
"The bomb could have ignited the atmosphere," No, it could not have.
That should say threats* not tweets, dammit.
POTUS tweeting nuclear tweets didn't convince you of that already?
You've just invented forums, but worse in some ways.
> is the only platform where interesting ML discussions happen daily with a large amount of actual researchers and practitioners talking about their work directly arxiv.org
I have a shorter algorithm. 1) Don't.
Don't have the web be four sites full of screenshots of each other. I.e. go back to the blog and forums era. Outlaw social media with more than X users. Make content recommendation algorithms illegal. Personalised…
> a smarter solution, Add the following to your hosts file 127.0.0.1 twitter.com This saves you from even loading those DOM elements in the first place
Your hnews username is an identity. A small, weak, and reasonably disposable one, that you can have many of. Why do you want to use your God damn real name on the Internet unless you are a public person already? What do…
RTFA and find out!
It achieves a theoretical lower bound on the complexity. This is what the article says in like 1000 words because it's written for mathematical illiterates.
Yes, lots of people do things that are bad ideas.
No, they are not. Reddit (and even more so Discord) does not have the permanence that forums have and far worse tools for formatting posts, so every subreddit degenerates into 101 questions, circlejerking, and meme…
Maybe it shouldn't be split up but burned, razed, and the ground salted so nothing will ever grow there again.
We used to have forums and blogs organised by interest topic or community. An elegant mode of organisation, for a more civilised age.
So vim but for finance?
You can @ the President of the United States on Twitter
Every time I come across a piece in that style I want to smash a screen. It could be a one-paragraph solution, but I have to scroll past three images and five paragraphs of worthless blather that assumes I'm a moron.…
Twitter has been orders of magnitude more harmful to society than any *chan and Twitter bluechecks should be thought of and treated like Twitter bluechecks think of and treat chan users. All those articles about how…
No, they did know for sure.
There's a reason RTFM was so prevalent, and we need to make it so, again.
No, Bethe and others knew in the 40s it could not have. Enough nuclear physics was known then to know that the atmosphere cannot be ignited by a nuke. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-telle...
Twitter weighs about a MB, a tweet is at most 280 characters, and typically of negative utility to the user and society. So yes.
Then why the fuck is the average website measured in megabytes
It's amazing that 3-4 seconds is considered a reasonable target in 2020 when 8 seconds was a target on freaking dialup. It's like having a Ferrari and considering outrunning a horse a success.
"The bomb could have ignited the atmosphere," No, it could not have.
That should say threats* not tweets, dammit.
POTUS tweeting nuclear tweets didn't convince you of that already?
You've just invented forums, but worse in some ways.
> is the only platform where interesting ML discussions happen daily with a large amount of actual researchers and practitioners talking about their work directly arxiv.org
I have a shorter algorithm. 1) Don't.
Don't have the web be four sites full of screenshots of each other. I.e. go back to the blog and forums era. Outlaw social media with more than X users. Make content recommendation algorithms illegal. Personalised…
> a smarter solution, Add the following to your hosts file 127.0.0.1 twitter.com This saves you from even loading those DOM elements in the first place
Your hnews username is an identity. A small, weak, and reasonably disposable one, that you can have many of. Why do you want to use your God damn real name on the Internet unless you are a public person already? What do…