I re-ran SLOC using the sloccount-clojure tool, we sit at about 34k lines using that tool. Instead of my jenky find/egrep/wc.
We developed OMF using agile scrum, not waterfall, but we ultimately were running our agile process within a waterfall
Not sure if there is a policy. Are there acronyms in particular, I tried to limit it to the couple applications we interface with. Which truth be told I don't know off the top of my head what they stand for. More…
If needed we or Boeing would take over the lamina library, or migrate to an alternative like core.async or manifold.
Aaron, how are you counting the SLOC? I am not doing a simple `wc -l` on all clj files in our project. I am looking for lines that include either closing parenthesis or closing brackets. It isn't exact. A better count…
I was made aware of a private Clojure project that is comprised of over 30k lines. So we aren't the largest, but probably the first to be on a commercial aircraft. But as Tim pointed out auditing of open source projects…
I re-ran SLOC using the sloccount-clojure tool, we sit at about 34k lines using that tool. Instead of my jenky find/egrep/wc.
We developed OMF using agile scrum, not waterfall, but we ultimately were running our agile process within a waterfall
Not sure if there is a policy. Are there acronyms in particular, I tried to limit it to the couple applications we interface with. Which truth be told I don't know off the top of my head what they stand for. More…
If needed we or Boeing would take over the lamina library, or migrate to an alternative like core.async or manifold.
Aaron, how are you counting the SLOC? I am not doing a simple `wc -l` on all clj files in our project. I am looking for lines that include either closing parenthesis or closing brackets. It isn't exact. A better count…
I was made aware of a private Clojure project that is comprised of over 30k lines. So we aren't the largest, but probably the first to be on a commercial aircraft. But as Tim pointed out auditing of open source projects…