It's an optimal first order approximation. Anything anyone with a capital-C in their job title says in public should be assumed to be marketing material.
Snake oil scam. They simply don't do what the label on the box says they do.
The sooner the better.
The models are still useful bumbling fools. We're in the flat part of the curve because we've exhausted existing data sources.
I disagree with your assessment pretty strongly -- the models themselves hit a wall over a year ago once companies exhausted all existing training data. LLMs don't induce world models, and they aren't capable of real…
> OpenAI and Anthropic are heavily subsidizing their inference -- no wait, they are charging the most they can get away with before going public. Where is the truth? Both. They are charging the most they can get away…
> As an employer, I want AI to be fully allowed for assignments, and the assignments to be made trickier to compensate. This is like saying first graders should learn to use calculators, not how to do arithmetic. Some…
> The NLA would be forced to use human readable representations to get a successful round trip. That still doesn't guarantee any semantic correspondence between the human readable representation and the model's…
> LLMs are based on neural networks, so one could create an interface where activating certain neurons triggers tool calls, with other neurons encoding the inputs; another set of neurons could be triggered by the…
> I think the point the GP was trying to make is that the GitHub UI ought to be able to allow you to submit a branch with multiple well-organized commits and review each commit separately with its own PR So the point…
Why do you insist on a different but functionally equivalent solution to the problem? It's weird. > Why do we tolerate the fact that GitHub doesn't let you say "approved for changes in `frontend/*` That's literally what…
Depends on what you consider long-lived. I typically generate stacks of 3-5 PRs in 1-2 days now (in a gen-AI world).
Because sometimes there are changes that need to land as all or nothing.
> When competing for resources, killing your neighbour frees up resources, which you can take. Most species of animal and even plants do this to some extent. If anything, I'd say plants do it more. Everything in the…
There's been a massive step change in their capability per unit cost. What used to cost millions per unit now costs tens of thousands. That's significant. It's like saying artillery isn't that big a deal in 1914. After…
> Catering to their loudest supporters Name one instance of this actually happening. I'll wait.
Calling "reasoning tokens" "thinking" is a complete confusion of concepts on your part.
Nope. It's only surprising to people who still think they're going to build God out of LLMs.
No, it's significantly more complex.
They are referring to Hetch Hetchy.
How about critiquing the actual recommendation instead of the people?
Too bad they voted to eliminate accountability for businesses that poison people. Now they get to find out.
I have a Miele canister vacuum. I love it. My wife bought the Dyson garbage anyway because she can't ignore her instagram feed.
> Refuse to express uncertainty or nuance (i asked ChatGPT to give me certainty %s which it did for a while but then just forgot...?) They're literally incapable of this. Any number they give you is bullshit.
You're hallucinating things I did not say.
It's an optimal first order approximation. Anything anyone with a capital-C in their job title says in public should be assumed to be marketing material.
Snake oil scam. They simply don't do what the label on the box says they do.
The sooner the better.
The models are still useful bumbling fools. We're in the flat part of the curve because we've exhausted existing data sources.
I disagree with your assessment pretty strongly -- the models themselves hit a wall over a year ago once companies exhausted all existing training data. LLMs don't induce world models, and they aren't capable of real…
> OpenAI and Anthropic are heavily subsidizing their inference -- no wait, they are charging the most they can get away with before going public. Where is the truth? Both. They are charging the most they can get away…
> As an employer, I want AI to be fully allowed for assignments, and the assignments to be made trickier to compensate. This is like saying first graders should learn to use calculators, not how to do arithmetic. Some…
> The NLA would be forced to use human readable representations to get a successful round trip. That still doesn't guarantee any semantic correspondence between the human readable representation and the model's…
> LLMs are based on neural networks, so one could create an interface where activating certain neurons triggers tool calls, with other neurons encoding the inputs; another set of neurons could be triggered by the…
> I think the point the GP was trying to make is that the GitHub UI ought to be able to allow you to submit a branch with multiple well-organized commits and review each commit separately with its own PR So the point…
Why do you insist on a different but functionally equivalent solution to the problem? It's weird. > Why do we tolerate the fact that GitHub doesn't let you say "approved for changes in `frontend/*` That's literally what…
Depends on what you consider long-lived. I typically generate stacks of 3-5 PRs in 1-2 days now (in a gen-AI world).
Because sometimes there are changes that need to land as all or nothing.
> When competing for resources, killing your neighbour frees up resources, which you can take. Most species of animal and even plants do this to some extent. If anything, I'd say plants do it more. Everything in the…
There's been a massive step change in their capability per unit cost. What used to cost millions per unit now costs tens of thousands. That's significant. It's like saying artillery isn't that big a deal in 1914. After…
> Catering to their loudest supporters Name one instance of this actually happening. I'll wait.
Calling "reasoning tokens" "thinking" is a complete confusion of concepts on your part.
Nope. It's only surprising to people who still think they're going to build God out of LLMs.
No, it's significantly more complex.
They are referring to Hetch Hetchy.
How about critiquing the actual recommendation instead of the people?
Too bad they voted to eliminate accountability for businesses that poison people. Now they get to find out.
I have a Miele canister vacuum. I love it. My wife bought the Dyson garbage anyway because she can't ignore her instagram feed.
> Refuse to express uncertainty or nuance (i asked ChatGPT to give me certainty %s which it did for a while but then just forgot...?) They're literally incapable of this. Any number they give you is bullshit.
You're hallucinating things I did not say.