This is a good point. It's a form of future proofing. Hopefully Apple doesn't drop the ball too hard on backward compatibility. For me I just want a set of consistent things from car to car. I have a few different…
This reminds me of the dude on youtube building a chip fab in his shed.
Just based on this conversation we are doomed. Nobody even agrees with you that there is a spending problem. They all think the "wealthy" magically have a ton of untaxed cash flow to solve the insane over spending.…
The issue here is everyone expects the government to be their literal daddy. The government isn't there to take care of you.
I'm with you, these people you are arguing with just want to spend us into oblivion. If people think we've had high inflation up until now well... we are just getting started.
A minimum of 2030? That seems excessively pessimistic.
SpaceX already has 10,000 satellites on orbit that are basically preview versions of space data centers. They've already paid 5 years of that 5-10 year timeline you outlined.
This all sounds like really good reasons not to have anything to do with the place.
I actually think the article makes some pretty interesting points. It's not about the name of it though.
Shocking! The owner of a company owns the company! Who knew?
Not bad litmus tests. And yes a lot of idiots seem to fail at steel manning. I mean if you can't steel man your opponent what are you even doing?
Not to mention the Iron Maiden song! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF7cWpBTZ6s
I mean we used dist^2 all the time for comparisons in our game engine back in the 90s (multiple different engines actually). So it was a known thing...
Oxfam are just communists who have lost any credibility with me that they may have ever had.
Which helps nobody because that's not a measure of thriving or even of how well people are doing. It's a useless metric.
Why could it not have been? LLM is just a reasoning machine something Asimov spent a lot of time thinking about.
I also have >30 years and I've had the same experience. I noticed an immediate improvement with 4.5 and I've been getting great results in general. And yes I do make sure it's not generating crazy architecture. It might…
This is how I eventually ended up being CTO and eventually CEO. I wanted the overall business to succeed.
As someone who has managed engineers for many years I find those skills immediately applicable to the LLM domain. If you aren't used to communicating what you are trying to build to other engineers I think using the AI…
I watched a friend of mine minmax Moviepass so hard. They were so doomed.
My taxes (flow through LLC) are significantly higher than my income for 2024 (like hundreds of k).
This one hit my company pretty hard.
>nd why the OS authors are broke OS authors aren't broke. In fact the guys from Microsoft are some of the richest dudes in the world. Maybe OS authors that give away their stuff for free are broke?
If you want to get paid maybe don't give away your software for free? This comes across as major sour grapes. "I made this free thing for people to use and they don't pay me for it!!" Ok, then maybe don't give it away?
Electrification is not the goal, reducing net carbon output is the goal. Electrification is simply one of the methods we can use. For things like air travel carbon neutral fuels are likely a better short to medium term…
This is a good point. It's a form of future proofing. Hopefully Apple doesn't drop the ball too hard on backward compatibility. For me I just want a set of consistent things from car to car. I have a few different…
This reminds me of the dude on youtube building a chip fab in his shed.
Just based on this conversation we are doomed. Nobody even agrees with you that there is a spending problem. They all think the "wealthy" magically have a ton of untaxed cash flow to solve the insane over spending.…
The issue here is everyone expects the government to be their literal daddy. The government isn't there to take care of you.
I'm with you, these people you are arguing with just want to spend us into oblivion. If people think we've had high inflation up until now well... we are just getting started.
A minimum of 2030? That seems excessively pessimistic.
SpaceX already has 10,000 satellites on orbit that are basically preview versions of space data centers. They've already paid 5 years of that 5-10 year timeline you outlined.
This all sounds like really good reasons not to have anything to do with the place.
I actually think the article makes some pretty interesting points. It's not about the name of it though.
Shocking! The owner of a company owns the company! Who knew?
Not bad litmus tests. And yes a lot of idiots seem to fail at steel manning. I mean if you can't steel man your opponent what are you even doing?
Not to mention the Iron Maiden song! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF7cWpBTZ6s
I mean we used dist^2 all the time for comparisons in our game engine back in the 90s (multiple different engines actually). So it was a known thing...
Oxfam are just communists who have lost any credibility with me that they may have ever had.
Which helps nobody because that's not a measure of thriving or even of how well people are doing. It's a useless metric.
Why could it not have been? LLM is just a reasoning machine something Asimov spent a lot of time thinking about.
I also have >30 years and I've had the same experience. I noticed an immediate improvement with 4.5 and I've been getting great results in general. And yes I do make sure it's not generating crazy architecture. It might…
This is how I eventually ended up being CTO and eventually CEO. I wanted the overall business to succeed.
As someone who has managed engineers for many years I find those skills immediately applicable to the LLM domain. If you aren't used to communicating what you are trying to build to other engineers I think using the AI…
I watched a friend of mine minmax Moviepass so hard. They were so doomed.
My taxes (flow through LLC) are significantly higher than my income for 2024 (like hundreds of k).
This one hit my company pretty hard.
>nd why the OS authors are broke OS authors aren't broke. In fact the guys from Microsoft are some of the richest dudes in the world. Maybe OS authors that give away their stuff for free are broke?
If you want to get paid maybe don't give away your software for free? This comes across as major sour grapes. "I made this free thing for people to use and they don't pay me for it!!" Ok, then maybe don't give it away?
Electrification is not the goal, reducing net carbon output is the goal. Electrification is simply one of the methods we can use. For things like air travel carbon neutral fuels are likely a better short to medium term…