Doesn't every word in a given definition have an "outgoing edge?"
And I and I, if you're qualia computing
Two words. "1" and "0"
That dimension is still on a thin film around a little ball floating in one of a great number of possible universes within a great number of possible rule systems. Compared to that space, we are quite similar to fish,…
> The author is apparently unaware that this tautological response eliminates the distinction between general and specialized intelligence, as one could just as validly (or vacuously) say that a superhuman intelligence…
Ah, never mind, I just saw sh-ok.
Or sh/ls, like we would do with js/alert, where sh is some handle to a global shell object we can call from within a form.
A reader macro for embedding shell commands within clojure forms would be interesting. Something like: (let [x #sh ls] (pprint x)) Or some kind of way to embed shell execution directly in the form...
Doesn't every word in a given definition have an "outgoing edge?"
And I and I, if you're qualia computing
Two words. "1" and "0"
That dimension is still on a thin film around a little ball floating in one of a great number of possible universes within a great number of possible rule systems. Compared to that space, we are quite similar to fish,…
> The author is apparently unaware that this tautological response eliminates the distinction between general and specialized intelligence, as one could just as validly (or vacuously) say that a superhuman intelligence…
Ah, never mind, I just saw sh-ok.
Or sh/ls, like we would do with js/alert, where sh is some handle to a global shell object we can call from within a form.
A reader macro for embedding shell commands within clojure forms would be interesting. Something like: (let [x #sh ls] (pprint x)) Or some kind of way to embed shell execution directly in the form...