I'll even read your post about working with Claude, the challenges you still needed to solve, the treadmill of 'we're just about there, we just need xyz'. Just write it yourself It's a blog post. If it's not worth your…
Maybe I misunderstood, or took their argument too literally. I understood it to be damning screens specifically. Seems like we're all generally in agreement, then. Probably nothing to do with the literal act of seeing…
Isn't this counter to the idea that gaming can also slow cognitive decline for similar reasons? The average CounterStrike player, for example, is scanning complex structures trying to identify an enemy, listening to…
If the rise of multiplayer games didn't encourage LAN gameplay why would removing the need for a second player bring people to play in person
How are you sure it's not developing just new and different tics?
Oh boy! A whole .06 seconds?! I can't wait to abandon the last company in the industry that atleast tries to pretend they care about the consumer, for .06 seconds faster launch!
Pedantic, but 'Stay at home' generally refers to someone who's chosen to not partake in the work-force, and instead raise a child/children. "Stay at home mom working remotely" is paradoxical, I think. This doesn't take…
For something like X or YouTube, do you think premium membership holds enough weight to be considered a third customer? Or do the numbers just get dwarfed by Ad networks and bots?
No, I don't think DDT should be legalized. The cons do not outweigh the pros, and we have viable alternatives without such drawbacks. There's no valid excuse for someone to release DDT into the atmosphere, so there's no…
Seems to be pretty on-par with their release schedule? Big #.0 updates every ~10 months, quick bug fixes after
Constructed by WHOM? These programs don't just poof into existence
Mate. I'm saying you hold humans accountable for actions caused by themselves. If I ask an LLM to make me DDT, I should be held just as accountable as if I bought it on the black-market, right? It's not suddenly…
>sovereign AI Do you understand these are computer programs? These are not living beings with emotions, motivations, fears....
If I clean my gun (tool) while it's loaded (stupid idea) and it goes off, who's to blame? The 'stupid user causing the problem', right? I personally wouldn't blame the gun... If it falls into the wrong person's hands,…
Why draw the line at the person with the brain capable of free thought, instead of their great great great grandparents? Am I understanding your question correctly?
Legally, we draw the line at the human causing the action (Insanity pleas withstanding). I don't see why we treat this any differently.
>99998 years ago when it became legal for an AI to own an LLC There's no way to provide a good faith rebuttal here. My entire argument is an extension of "LLMs can't be held accountable, so they must never make…
I don't think so...? Maybe I'm understanding the article wrong? I get the overlay, but I'm being specific to LLM chains... They require something to kick them off, they do not act autonomously. A human does something,…
Context overload can cause strange results, yes. Hence why a HUMAN needs to be held responsible for the output of their tools. EVERY breakout that's hit mainstream news has been because of a single 'Security Firm',…
I think you go back to the original instance, yes. In your example, who's paying for it? Whether by providing the hardware + power or paying a LLM service. Whoever is paying the maintenance cost is responsible, in the…
Right. Even when an LLM prompts an LLM, what prompted the first one in the chain?
> Why does it matter so much whether there was a human who typed into a chatbot or another LLM invoked a sub-sub-agent? Responsibility. Someone needs to be held responsible for any damages done, plain and simple. You…
Sure, but it's still not skynet-level 'the AI just started doing things'. It does what it finds it needs to do to achieve the goal defined in the prompt. It's very important to not personify these tools and remember…
Built by whom
An LLM can prompt an LLM when first prompted by a human. I think OP is trying to convey the idea that LLMs do not take initiative to do anything, and these are not 'beings' capable of doing things. These are tools being…
I'll even read your post about working with Claude, the challenges you still needed to solve, the treadmill of 'we're just about there, we just need xyz'. Just write it yourself It's a blog post. If it's not worth your…
Maybe I misunderstood, or took their argument too literally. I understood it to be damning screens specifically. Seems like we're all generally in agreement, then. Probably nothing to do with the literal act of seeing…
Isn't this counter to the idea that gaming can also slow cognitive decline for similar reasons? The average CounterStrike player, for example, is scanning complex structures trying to identify an enemy, listening to…
If the rise of multiplayer games didn't encourage LAN gameplay why would removing the need for a second player bring people to play in person
How are you sure it's not developing just new and different tics?
Oh boy! A whole .06 seconds?! I can't wait to abandon the last company in the industry that atleast tries to pretend they care about the consumer, for .06 seconds faster launch!
Pedantic, but 'Stay at home' generally refers to someone who's chosen to not partake in the work-force, and instead raise a child/children. "Stay at home mom working remotely" is paradoxical, I think. This doesn't take…
For something like X or YouTube, do you think premium membership holds enough weight to be considered a third customer? Or do the numbers just get dwarfed by Ad networks and bots?
No, I don't think DDT should be legalized. The cons do not outweigh the pros, and we have viable alternatives without such drawbacks. There's no valid excuse for someone to release DDT into the atmosphere, so there's no…
Seems to be pretty on-par with their release schedule? Big #.0 updates every ~10 months, quick bug fixes after
Constructed by WHOM? These programs don't just poof into existence
Mate. I'm saying you hold humans accountable for actions caused by themselves. If I ask an LLM to make me DDT, I should be held just as accountable as if I bought it on the black-market, right? It's not suddenly…
>sovereign AI Do you understand these are computer programs? These are not living beings with emotions, motivations, fears....
If I clean my gun (tool) while it's loaded (stupid idea) and it goes off, who's to blame? The 'stupid user causing the problem', right? I personally wouldn't blame the gun... If it falls into the wrong person's hands,…
Why draw the line at the person with the brain capable of free thought, instead of their great great great grandparents? Am I understanding your question correctly?
Legally, we draw the line at the human causing the action (Insanity pleas withstanding). I don't see why we treat this any differently.
>99998 years ago when it became legal for an AI to own an LLC There's no way to provide a good faith rebuttal here. My entire argument is an extension of "LLMs can't be held accountable, so they must never make…
I don't think so...? Maybe I'm understanding the article wrong? I get the overlay, but I'm being specific to LLM chains... They require something to kick them off, they do not act autonomously. A human does something,…
Context overload can cause strange results, yes. Hence why a HUMAN needs to be held responsible for the output of their tools. EVERY breakout that's hit mainstream news has been because of a single 'Security Firm',…
I think you go back to the original instance, yes. In your example, who's paying for it? Whether by providing the hardware + power or paying a LLM service. Whoever is paying the maintenance cost is responsible, in the…
Right. Even when an LLM prompts an LLM, what prompted the first one in the chain?
> Why does it matter so much whether there was a human who typed into a chatbot or another LLM invoked a sub-sub-agent? Responsibility. Someone needs to be held responsible for any damages done, plain and simple. You…
Sure, but it's still not skynet-level 'the AI just started doing things'. It does what it finds it needs to do to achieve the goal defined in the prompt. It's very important to not personify these tools and remember…
Built by whom
An LLM can prompt an LLM when first prompted by a human. I think OP is trying to convey the idea that LLMs do not take initiative to do anything, and these are not 'beings' capable of doing things. These are tools being…